Strengthening flood risk management and preparedness - Cabinet member responses to the recommendations of the scrutiny task and finish group
Decision Maker: External Scrutiny Committee
Decision status: For Determination
Is Key decision?: No
To receive and consider the Cabinet Member
responses to the scrutiny task and finish group's report.
The Chair welcomed County Councillor Albert Atkinson, Cabinet Member for Technical Services, Rural Affairs and Waste Management; Rachel Crompton, Flood Risk Manager; John Davies, Head of Service Highways; and Marcus Leigh, Highways Service Manager – Infrastructure; to the meeting to present the written responses to the committee's recommendations on strengthening flood risk management and preparedness.
County Councillor Albert Atkinson, Cabinet Member for Technical Services, Rural Affairs and Waste Management, thanked the committee and the members of Strengthening Flood Risk Management and Preparedness Task and Finish Group for their comprehensive report. The recommendations of the task group had been looked at in great detail and the Cabinet Member accepted all of the recommendations. Timescales for proposed actions were also set out in the response.
A number of comments and issues were raised by members in relation to the written responses and the following was noted:
· Assurance was sought by the committee that the ongoing review of staffing levels within the Flood Risk Management Team, would not result in a reduction in the number of staff supporting the function.
It was reported that following a recent restructure of the Highways Management Service a review of where the Flood Risk Management Team needed strengthening was currently underway. In addition a new manager post had been created within the team. Councillors suggested this information be communicated to Flood Action Groups to quash local rumour.
· The acceptance of the cabinet member to create a culvert policy was welcomed by the committee. The importance of locating historic culverts was highlighted. In addition it was felt that a map identifying locations of riparian responsibilities across the county would be advantageous.
· On surface water attenuation for new highways sponsored by the county council, it was reported that plans for current projects had already been completed and work was underway. It was pointed out that if the county council discovered aspects that could alleviate flooding then the appropriate action would be taken.
· On concerns regarding riparian owners' responsibilities it was explained that the subject matter was felt to be of a technical /specialist nature that provided a barrier to some owners in understanding their responsibilities. It was reported that the county council was exploring new ways of explaining riparian responsibilities to residents and local landowners.
· It was acknowledged that all risk management authorities were working within the constraints of a fragmented system. One member of the task and finish group had hoped that its work would have identified measures to reduce risk, improve resilience, speed recovery and build a single voice to influence change at a national level and felt that the outcome of the work was letters rather than leadership. In addition the member felt that they were unable to report back to their residents on what had changed as a result of the work undertaken. Furthermore it was felt that the county council did not recognise the value of flood action groups and the expertise they had and felt that the response to medium term recommendation M8 to enable participation from flood action groups at Making Space for Water meetings was dismissive.
· It was suggested that a flood risk management summit could be sponsored by the committee at some time in the future.
· Members of the committee requested to receive copies of the letters to be issued to the relevant Secretary of States.
It was noted that a number of timescales for actions to be completed by were set for December 2020. It was suggested that an update on those actions be presented to the committee at its meeting scheduled on 12 January 2021 and or all risk management authorities and flood action groups to be kept informed of the work of the committee. Subject to elections being held in 2021 and pre-election period a further update on progress be provided in March/April 2021.
1. The responses by the Cabinet Member for Technical Services, Rural Affairs and Waste Management be received.
2. Copies of the letters to the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government be circulated to the External Scrutiny Committee.
3. An update on the measures to be completed by December 2020 be presented to the External Scrutiny Committee at its meeting scheduled on 12 January 2021.
4. The Cabinet Member for Technical Services, Rural Affairs and Waste Management, and, the Flood Risk Management Team be thanked for all the work they had done.
Report author: Gary Halsall
Date of decision: 31/07/2020
Decided at meeting: 31/07/2020 - External Scrutiny Committee
- Edit Report: Strengthening flood risk management and preparedness - Cabinet member responses to the recommendations of the scrutiny task and finish group PDF 137 KB View as DOC (1) 148 KB
- Appendix 1 Strengthening flood risk management and preparedness - Cabinet member responses to the recommendations of the scrutiny task and finish group PDF 184 KB View as DOCX (2) 28 KB
- Appendix 2 Strengthening flood risk management and preparedness - Cabinet member responses to the recommendations of the scrutiny task and finish group PDF 992 KB View as DOC (3) 3 MB