Decision Maker: Environment, Economic Growth and Transport Scrutiny Committee
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Purpose:
Review progress with backlog of open reports
(defects on public rights of way).
Decisions:
The Chair welcomed Debbie King,
Head of Service Environment and Climate, and David Goode, Public
Rights of Way Manager to the meeting. County Councillor Shaun
Turner, Cabinet Member for Environment and Climate Change also
attended for this item.
The report provided an overview
of the responsibilities of the council in relation to Public Rights
of Way and how those functions were delivered by the service. The
officers provided a brief verbal update at the meeting and took
questions from the committee.
Comments and queries raised
from the committee were as follows:
- Obstructions counted for a
considerable number of investigations carried out by the Public
Rights of Way team. Examples included the public assuming they
could redirect footpaths from their property without proper process
or believing that livestock in a field was grounds for redirecting
a footpath. It was highlighted that the team covered maintenance
and enforcement and in providing context to this work, the
committee was informed that if a landowner did not fix an issue,
such as a broken gate, it would become an enforcement matter for
the county council.
- It was clarified that the county
council had the power to confirm unopposed right of way Orders, but
not opposed Orders. Opposed Orders were processed by the Planning
Inspectorate.
- The report highlighted numerous
unresolved defects or obstructions, some of which had persisted for
years. However, it was noted that there had been no specific plans
to address those unresolved issues, as they often were resolved
naturally (e.g. weather related issues) or were fixed by
landowners. Any safety related issues would be prioritised and
responded to on the same day where possible.
- Integration between the Public
Rights of Way system and the Love Clean Streets app would depend on
the review of the highways asset management system (HAMS) to
determine whether data would be integrated with the Love Clean
Streets app or an alternative system. As the systems were not
integrated, it was suggested that the instruction on the county
council's website to use the Love Clean Streets app for reporting
public rights of way defects be removed. Officers agreed with the
suggestion as the app also often led to unresolved issues and
confusion due to its street-based maps functionality. Email was
often the preferred method for contacting the Public Rights of Way
team instead of using the Love Clean Streets app, as administrative
staff were available to assist the public in accurately reporting
issues, ensuring better service delivery.
- The Local Delivery Scheme grants had
been designed to pump prime local projects and encourage local
ownership of public rights of way. It was suggested that providing
generic suggestions or examples of what could be achieved could
help parish and town councils prioritise important local projects
and these could be included in future correspondence.
- Whilst one member felt the
£500 Local Delivery Scheme grants were not considered
sufficient by some parish and town councils, it was noted that the
grants were intended for minor works that were important to the
local community but may not be a priority for the county
council.
- Due to the limited number of Public
Rights of Way Officers operating in the field, it was not possible
for the team to adopt the highways service model of having a
dedicated officer and point of contact for each district in the
back office.
- It was highlighted that the
geographical information (GIS) for public rights of way available
on the county council's MARIO website needed to be aligned with the
legal record (Definitive Map and Statement) and if completed would
largely avoid any confusion with local search information. It was
acknowledged that digitising the Definitive Map would be a
significant task and it was suggested that this task be prioritised
by the Cabinet Member, and for a timescale to be provided for when
this could be achieved by.
- In formulating recommendations, it
was further suggested that the Love Clean Streets app be improved
to log incidents in rural areas by capturing GPS locations at the
time of initiating a report, rather than when a phone signal was
received. It was felt this could ensure the accurate reporting of
issues, even when in areas with poor mobile phone signals.
The Chair thanked the Cabinet
Member and officers for attending and answering the committee's
questions.
Resolved: That;
i.
The prioritisation of digitising the Definitive Map
be recommended to the Cabinet Member for Environment and Climate
Change for consideration.
ii.
The Cabinet Member for Environment and Climate
Change also gives consideration to further publicising with
examples of what could be achieved with use of the annual Local
Delivery Scheme grant available to Parish and Town
Councils.
iii.
The Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport gives
consideration to reviewing whether the Love Clean Streets App can
capture a GPS location at the point in time of initiating a report
rather than when a phone signal is received.
Corporate Priorities : Thinking differently;
Divisions Affected: (All Divisions);
Contact: David Goode Email: david.goode@lancashire.gov.uk Tel: 01772 533723, Gary Halsall Email: gary.halsall@lancashire.gov.uk Tel: (01772) 536989.
Report author: David Goode
Date of decision: 17/03/2025
Decided at meeting: 17/03/2025 - Environment, Economic Growth and Transport Scrutiny Committee
Accompanying Documents: