Agenda and minutes

Members of the public are welcome to attend our meetings to watch them in person at any of the venues across the County. Publicly accessible meetings held in County Hall will be webcast, which means they are available to be watched live or recorded on our website. Please see our webcasting notice here. The Committee may, in certain circumstances, resolve to hold part of the meeting in private. If this is the case, you will be required to leave the meeting.

Venue: Council Chamber, County Hall, Preston

Contact: Dave Gorman  Tel: (01772) 534261, Email:  dave.gorman@lancashire.gov.uk

Media

Items
No. Item

1.

Apologies and Announcements

Minutes:

Apologies for absence were received from County Councillors Paul Greenall and Jenny Molineux.

 

Announcements

 

Death

 

The Chairman reported the recent death of former County Councillor Anthony Greaves, Baron Greaves, who sadly passed away on Tuesday 23 March 2021.

 

The Council observed a one minute silence.

2.

Disclosure of Pecuniary and Non-Pecuniary Interests

Minutes:

Name of Councillor

Agenda Item Number(s)

Nature of Interest (non-pecuniary unless stated)

County Councillor Andrew Gardiner

3

Member of Lancaster City Council

 

3.

Response to the Consultation on Local Government Reorganisation in Cumbria and North Yorkshire pdf icon PDF 715 KB

Additional documents:

Minutes:

County Councillor Alan Vincent presented the report detailing the county council's proposed response to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government's consultation on locally led proposals for local government reorganisation in Cumbria and North Yorkshire, and moved the following motion, seconded by County Councillor Charlie Edwards:

 

The Government has set out 3 main tests that will form the basis of the considerations of the Secretary of State regarding Local Government reorganisation in Cumbria and North Yorkshire;

 

1. Whether it will improve Local Government services.

2. Whether there is a good deal of local support in the round for the proposal.

3. Whether the proposed new areas cover a credible geography.

 

Only 2 of the proposals for Cumbria meet test 3, the credible geography test, the Bay unitary and the single Cumbria unitary, the other 2 failing the population size test.

 

Of these 2 the Bay proposal fails 1 and 2.

 

Test 1 because there has been no detailed analysis of the service implications of its proposal, and there is no evidence of the legacy impact on the rest of Lancashire.

Test 2 because there has been no consultation with Lancashire (outside of Lancaster) on their views on the Bay proposal, and indeed no consultation with Lancaster residents based upon the essential information set out below.

 

It would therefore be inappropriate to support the Bay proposal  in the absence of a full analysis of any risk to vital services it might entail; without a full assessment of the detriment it might cause to people reliant on those services; without a full assessment of the cost implications on residents and businesses alike as well as the impact on historical and cultural services, unique to Lancashire and Lancaster in particular, especially as no Local Government reorganisation is planned for the rest of Lancashire.

 

In conclusion therefore based upon the above Lancashire County Council resolves that in the absence of the analysis and consultation required to meet the 3 Government tests, the only proposal that meets the Government tests is the single Cumbria proposal.

 

And further resolves that a copy of the Officer’s report also be submitted to Government. The County Council finally resolves that it has no comment to make upon the North Yorkshire proposals.

 

On being put to the vote, the amendment was CARRIED. It was therefore:

 

Resolved: - That:

 

The Government has set out 3 main tests that will form the basis of the considerations of the Secretary of State regarding Local Government reorganisation in Cumbria and North Yorkshire;

 

1. Whether it will improve Local Government services.

2. Whether there is a good deal of local support in the round for the proposal.

3. Whether the proposed new areas cover a credible geography.

 

Only 2 of the proposals for Cumbria meet test 3, the credible geography test, the Bay unitary and the single Cumbria unitary, the other 2 failing the population size test.

 

Of these 2 the Bay proposal fails 1 and 2.

 

Test 1 because there has been no  ...  view the full minutes text for item 3.