Agenda and minutes

Special Meeting, Lancashire Local Access Forum - Tuesday, 24th November, 2020 10.00 am

Members of the public are welcome to attend our meetings to watch them in person at any of the venues across the County. Publicly accessible meetings held in County Hall will be webcast, which means they are available to be watched live or recorded on our website. Please see our webcasting notice here. The Committee may, in certain circumstances, resolve to hold part of the meeting in private. If this is the case, you will be required to leave the meeting.

Venue: Zoom Virtual Meeting - Zoom. View directions

Contact: Garth Harbison  Tel: 01772 530596 Email:  garth.harbison@lancashire.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

1.

Apologies for Absence

Minutes:

Apologies were received from County Councillor Ian Brown, County Councillor Cosima Towneley, County Councillor Jimmy Eaton, Jenny Allen, Arthur Baldwin, Adam Briggs, Peter Edge, Rosemary Hogarth, Ms Chris Peat, Michael Prescott, Paul Withington and Councillor Phil Riley.

2.

Introduction

Minutes:

The Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting. The Chair pointed out that the LLAF first made representations in March 2020 on the northern part of the coastal path from the Cumbrian Border down to Cleveleys. The LLAF had concentrated on the bigger issue of the Pilling embankment. The reason for this was that the forum hoped to enhance the speed at which the process was carrying on. The forum wanted the footpath put in quickly.

 

It was pointed out that during Covid there was a flurry of illegal signs put up to stop people using rights of way. The LLAF had asked the Public Rights of Way Team to take urgent action on this which they had done.

 

It was noted that the Regional Access Forum had still continued which the Chairs of the Local Access Forums attended. It was important for these meetings to continue. The Chair pointed out that the last Regional Access Forum Zoom meeting was cancelled as there was no funding for it.

3.

Notification of publication of Coastal Access Reports - Cleveleys to Pier Head, Liverpool

Minutes:

The Chair wished to thank all the staff and Natural England and all the local authorities involved with the coastal path.

 

Julie Paton, LCC Public Rights of Way Officer, stated that it was Lancashire County Council's responsibility to implement the line of the trail once it had been agreed by the Secretary of State.

 

One issue with the path was at the River Douglas. The biggest concern here was that the path stopped as there was a lack of a crossing. The forum was informed that LCC would not be making any representations on this section as it felt there were no areas it could make a difference to on the proposals.  It was pointed out that Hesketh with Becconsall Parish Council was looking to do some of its own work which was considering the option of using the redundant pipe bridge to become a pedestrian bridge. LCC was looking at where the path could cross the River Douglas and where the correct place would be. It would be costly as the river was tidal and very large. The Ramblers Association stated that it was regrettable there was not a crossing over the River Douglas and that funding should be provided for one. LCC had ruled out where it could not put a bridge due to various circumstances but had not ruled in where it could. It was also noted that there was no financial support to put a bridge in due to the cost.

 

Regarding maps CPH 3e and 3f, another place of controversy was around Hutton Marsh and the embankments near the Dolphin Pub. It was thought that a route along either embankment would provide better views. There were exclusions to existing public rights of way here due to the protection of nesting birds. Where the path had been ruled out was due the Lancashire County Council and Natural England being aware of existing nesting birds and would be managed as a bird nesting site. It was pointed out that nature conservation had to be balanced with access rights. It was stated that LCC was not making any representations on this area. LCC was not the landowner. The legislation looked at access and whether it was appropriate access and took into account nature conservation concerns.

 

The forum was informed that the whole of the English Coastal Path allowed access for pedestrians and their dogs. There were some sections where the dogs must be on leads and some sections here they did not. The only reason where access would be denied would be for nature conservation. The Ramblers Association's response would be to the different standards of rules around the country. The Association felt there was no uniformity in decision making across the country.

 

Regarding Map CPH 3g and the section of the path near the old Longton tip which was now grassed over, the Ramblers Association felt the path could go further to the west than what was being proposed. They felt the path should continue running south  ...  view the full minutes text for item 3.

4.

Any Other Business

Minutes:

There was no Any Other Business.

5.

Date of Next Meeting

To be confirmed.

Minutes:

To be confirmed.