Decisions

Marcus Hudson, Head of Service Planning & Transport, on behalf of the Andrew Mullaney, Director of Environment and Planning took a decision to extend a tendered contract with Delib Ltd for a further 12 months, in line with Procurement Rule 14.3.

Ridwan Musa, Head of Service, on behalf of the Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport took a decision to approve the placing of an order with CJ Jetz Ltd for gully cleaning work in Fylde and Wyre districts in October 2024.

A decision on a direct award.

Paula Hawley-Evans, Consultant in Public Health, on behalf of Dr Sakthi Kurananithi, Director of Public Health, Wellbeing and Communities took a decision as set out in the report.

A decision taken on a contract extension.

Dr Sakthi Karunanithi, Director of Public Health, took the decision as set out in the report.

Lancashire County Council is the Waste Disposal Authority for the administrative county of Lancashire. The Authority operates and manages fifteen Household Waste Recycling Centres (HWRCs), thirteen of which is where hard plastic waste can be deposited by members of the public.

Examples of hard plastics, sometimes called rigid plastics, include plastic storage containers; buckets and bins; plastic patio furniture; large children’s toys; plastic gutters, downpipes and utility pipes; wheelie bins; compost bins and water butts; plastic plant pots; car bumpers; and traffic cones and barriers.

Hard plastics can be recycled by sorting the plastics according to polymer type and cleaned, then shredding into flakes or melting into pellets, before being moulded into new goods.

Since April 2021, the Authority has been operating informal trial agreements to manage the disposal of hard plastics. These arrangements started out as a temporary measure as the Authority adjusted its waste management operations to accommodate separating out hard plastic from waste destined for landfill.

However, in recent months, the trial supplier has struggled to meet service delivery expectations and has at times been unable to accept hard plastic waste or requested significant increases in gate fee. As such, there is currently a pause on separating out hard plastic waste, with the waste instead going into the non-recyclable containers on the HWRCs and sent to landfill.

A formally procured contract is now required to fully test the market and comply with Public Contracts Regulations 2015.

The procurement will consist of two lots covering different areas of the county of Lancashire. The resulting framework agreements requires the acceptance and recycling of hard plastic that is delivered into the provider by the Authority and/or it's transport contractor from the HWRCs.

The framework agreements will be for an initial period of two years, with the option to extend for any number of defined periods up to a further two years, to commence on or around 01 February 2025.

Andrew Mullaney, Director of Environment and Planning took a decision to approve commencement of procurement to establish two framework agreements for the provision of acceptance and recycling of hard plastic services. The services will commence on 1 February 2025 and have an initial term of two years, with the option to extend for any number of defined periods up to a further two years. The procurement process will be an Open Above Threshold tender process.

John Davies, Head of Highways Network Management, on behalf of Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport took a decision to approve the recommendation in the report.

A query relating to highway extent was received from colleagues in Highways Operations relating to a wall which may have footway in front but also a footway / footpath behind, with possible public right to pass down either side of the wall. The query is over whether the wall was maintainable at public expense by the highway authority.

Following the investigation it is considered that on balance of probability, the wall at back of footway forms the boundary of private land and therefore, both the wall at back of footway and the pathway on the Subject land do NOT form part of Lancashire County Councils highway extent, and are therefore not maintainable at public expense.

It is therefore recommended that the highway extent be amended to reflect that the wall in question forms the boundary of private land and as such, our maintained at public expense (MAPE) records should reflect that our highway extent stops at the wall, with the wall and passageway behind reflected as private land.

John Davies, Head of Highways Network Management, on behalf of Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport took a decision to approve the recommendation in the report.

County Councillor Yousuf Motala considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £240 to Mill Bank Wellbeing Centre towards the cost of monthly cultural celebration and children's books.

County Councillor Nweeda Khan considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £240 to Mill Bank Wellbeing Centre towards the cost of monthly cultural celebration and children's books.

The Cabinet approved the recommendation(s) as set out in the report.

The appointment of an Agreed Syllabus Conference to commence in Autumn 2024 for the purpose of reviewing the Lancashire Agreed Syllabus for Religious Education.

The Cabinet approved the recommendation(s) as set out in the report.

A decision to sign off the Legal agreement on behalf of Lancashire County Council under delegated authority secured at Cabinet on 9th May 2024.

Phil Green, Executive Director of Growth, Environment, Transport & Health took the decision as set out in the report.

County Councillor Loraine Cox considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £300 to Bury Cabaret Lunch Club CIC towards the cost of entertainment at a Lunch Club meeting.

The Healthy Weight Programme is a key programme of work that spans Public Health, other departments within Lancashire County Council and beyond. 

Following the approval of the Public Health Strategy by Cabinet in July 2024 and ongoing work with district council colleagues and wider stakeholders, this report seeks approval for three supporting new areas of work namely:

Ø  The Lancashire Food Plan

Ø  The development of a Healthy Lancashire Advertising and Sponsorship Policy

Ø  The revised Hot Food Takeaway Advisory Note

The Cabinet approved the recommendation(s) as set out in the report.

The Council's Digital Strategy is planned for renewal in 2024 and will outline the Council's digital ambitions for the coming 5 years. To support the development of this strategy and stretch thinking a leading partner in this area was commissioned in February 2024.

Over the last 6 months a significant focus has been on the Council's resident and workforce views to ensure that the Council's future direction addresses some of today's challenges as well as what is needed to deliver for the future.

Further work is underway to ensure the look and feel of this new strategy complements the Council's existing published strategies.

The Cabinet approved the recommendation(s) as set out in the report.

In line with the county council's procurement rules, this report sets out a recommendation to approve the commencement of the following procurement exercises:

i) Speed Camera Enforcement

ii) Skew Bridge, Grimsargh - Bridge Widening Works

iii) Future Delivery of 0-19 (up to 25 years with SEND) Public Health Nursing Service in Lancashire in the geographical lots as set out in Appendix 'A'.

iv) Spray Injection Jet Patching and Heated In-Situ Road Repairs

In addition, this report sets out a request to approve a waiver of Procurement Rules:

v) Waiver of Procurement Rules to make a direct award for highway defect repairs as an interim measure until the procurement exercise in relation to the Spray Injection Jet Patching and Heated In-Situ Road Repairs has been completed.

At the conclusion of the procurement process, any award of contract will be made under Section 9.52 (36) of the county council's Scheme of Delegation to Officers.

This report also sets out necessary amendments to procurement processes already approved by Cabinet to proceed but are impacted following the 12 September 2024 Cabinet Office announcement that the commencement of the Procurement Act 2023 will be delayed until 24 February 2025.

This is deemed to be a Key Decision and the requirements of the council's Cabinet procedure rules (Standing Order C18, Consideration of Key Decisions) have been complied with.

In respect of exercise (iii) above, compliance with Standing Order C18, Consideration of Key Decisions, was not possible as the original proposals, subsequently amended, were not deemed to be Key at the time of publication of the Statutory Notice of Forthcoming Executive Key Decisions taken under the provision of Standing Order C18.

Cabinet approved the recommendation(s) as set out in the report.

Skills Bootcamps form part of the Government's Lifetime Skills Guarantee and are funded by the Department for Education under the National Skills Fund. Skills Bootcamps are commissioned through a combination of national procurement and grant allocations to lead authorities in Functional Economic Areas. In Lancashire, following the cessation of the Local Enterprise Partnership, this is now via Lancashire County Council on behalf of the upper tier authorities, pending decisions regarding the proposed Combined County Authority.

A total of £1.2m was allocated to Lancashire under Wave 3 for financial year 2022/23, £3m under Wave 4 in 2023/24 and £6.4m under Wave 5 (2024/25). 

The programme and proposal for Wave 6 (2025/26) were discussed at the Lancashire Skills and Employment Board on 5 September 2024. The Board was supportive of the recommendations to Cabinet.

This is deemed to be a Key Decision and the requirements of the council's Cabinet procedure rules (Standing Order C18, Consideration of Key Decisions) have been complied with.

The Cabinet approved the recommendation(s) as set out in the report.

The proposals are being pursued as part of a s278 Agreement under the Highways Act 1980 and S106 under the Town and Country Planning Act as part of a new development which will introduce further traffic movements.

The purpose of the proposed No Waiting and No Loading at Any Time restriction along Roddlesworth Way and Paradise Lane is to protect sight lines and ensure the safe movement of public transport.

Consultations

Formal consultation was carried out between 10 November-2023 and 8 December-2023 which included advertising in the local press and notices being displayed on site.  Divisional county councillors were consulted along with the council's usual consultees and the consultation documents posted on the council's website.

Following formal consultation seven responses of support were received, two raising additional comments.

Comments

Two of the respondents stated that they supported the proposal only on the bases that parking for Moss Side primary school is maintained to allow for the school drop off and pick-ups.

Officer's Response

Lancashire County Council highways were consulted as part of planning application 07/2017/3361/ORM for a hybrid application to provide around 850 to 950 dwellings; 28,000 sqm mixed business use; primary school; village centre including health centre/clinic.  As part of the planning public consolation Lancashire County Council highways recommended various changes to the speed limits, bus gate, traffic calming, weight restrictions; Pegasus crossings to try and mitigate against the impact of the new development; improve highway safety for the new residents and the existing road users; promotion of safe and desirable sustainable transport for all users and the promotion of public transport. All costs associated with the traffic calming and the traffic regulation orders and provision are being paid in full by the developer and all works must be directly linked to the development and the planning approval.

• No changes are being proposed to change the current parking on Paradise lane near Moss Side Primary School.

Peter Bell, Regulation and Enforcement Manager, on behalf of the Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport took a decision to approve the order.

This report sets out the draft School Place Planning Delivery Programme for 2024-27, proposing a series of projects which aim to provide additional places in existing schools and proposals to deliver two new primary schools and a new secondary school in Preston.

This is deemed to be a Key Decision and the requirements of the council's Cabinet procedure rules (Standing Order C18, Consideration of Key Decisions) have been complied with.

The Cabinet approved the recommendation(s) as set out in the report, with the following amendments:

Add the following recommendations:

  iv.  In addition to Recommendation (iii), pursue the design and planning for a new secondary school on the land to be released North of Maxy Lane assuming that the notice from the developer is issued within three months of today's date.

  v.  To authorise the Director of Finance and Commerce in consultation with the Cabinet Member for HR, Resources and Property and the Cabinet Member for Education and Skills to consider both sites and progress with the design and planning permission for the site that will provide the required places within the time constrained development schedule.

The original recommendation (iv.) would remain as published and was renumbered as recommendation (vi.)

A decison to approve the award of a single supplier contract for the provision of Redaction Software for Information Governance.

Josh Mynott, Head of Democratic Services, on behalf of Heloise MacAndrew, Director of Law and Governance took the decision as set out in the report.

Traffic Signal Refurbishment projects are funded annually via monies from the Transport Asset Management Plan (TAMP). These monies are spent refurbishing existing traffic signal junctions and stand-alone crossings at end of life.

It proposed to:

• Cancel / postpone Project 13557 – L3009 Eastgate / Avenue Parade / Stanley Street. After initial scheme design and high-level quoting there is insufficient budget to complete the works at this location.

£230k Budget

• Support the reallocation of monies from the cancelation / postponement of Project 13557 – L3009 Eastgate / Avenue Parade / Stanley Street to support projects within the Traffic Signal Refurbishment Programme with projected overspends. These schemes include:
Blackbull Lane / Sharoe Green Lane Junction, Preston
Additional Budget – £50,000
Garstang Road / Blackpool Road Junction, Preston
Additional Budget – £50,000
Garstang Road/North Road/Moor Lane, Preston
Additional Budget - £130,000
No additional monies are requested.

John Davies, Head of Highways Network Management, on behalf of Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport took a decision to approve the transfer of funds as set out in the report.

A decision on the expansion of St Augustines (PPMS 12161) requiring the final sum to be added to PPMS from the earmarked budget.

David Cahill, Capital Programme Officer, on behalf of the Noel O'Neill, Director of Finance and Commerce took the decision as set out in the report.

County Councillor Loraine Cox considered and approved a Local Member Grant for the reduced amount of £400 to Community Solutions North West towards the cost of cooking workshops.

Resolved: That the minutes of the meeting held on 21 May 2024 be confirmed as an accurate record and signed by the Chair.

The committee considered a report which set out its Chair and Deputy Chair, membership, and Terms of Reference for the 2024-25 municipal year.

Resolved: That the following be noted:

1. The appointment of County Councillors Ged Mirfin and John Shedwick as Chair and Deputy Chair respectively of the Community, Cultural and Corporate Services Scrutiny Committee for the 2024-25 municipal year;
2. The membership of the committee, following the County Council's Annual Meeting held on 23 May 2024; and
3. The Community, Cultural and Corporate Services Scrutiny Committee Terms of Reference.

The committee considered the work programme for the 2024/25 municipal year, and an update on actions and assurances.

It was noted that the Strategy for Change Management item would be discussed at the meeting on 9 December 2024, the Workforce Matters – (HR, Absenteeism Recruitment and Performance Management) would be discussed at the meeting on 31 October 2024, and the Asset Profile item would be discussed at the rescheduled March 2025 meeting.

It was also noted that a 4-hour scrutiny meeting was planned for the 12 February 2025 meeting, to focus on different aspects of the Lancashire Community Safety Partnership, and the 27 March 2025 meeting would be moved to an earlier date to avoid the county council's pre-election period.

Resolved: That

1. The work programme for 2024/25 at Appendix 'A' of the report be noted;
2. The formal written responses from County Councillor Peter Buckley, Cabinet Member for Community and Cultural Services to the Committee's recommendations on Lancashire Community Safety Agreement and Performance Update and Draft LCC Cohesion and Integration Strategy 2024/28 detailed in Appendix 'B' of the report, be noted;
3. The information included in the report for the 31 October 2024 meeting of the Committee be confirmed; and
4. The information provided as part of the actions and assurances to the Committee with regard to future work programme items at Appendix 'C' of the report be noted.

The Chair welcomed County Councillor Peter Buckley, Cabinet Member for Communities and Cultural Services, and Andy Walker, Head of Service Business Growth and External Funding, to the meeting. The report presented detailed how work to support Arts Council designated and funded National Portfolio Organisations (NPO's) were being supported within Lancashire and the council's expectations for how the next round of National Portfolio Organisations funding may play out in Lancashire. A presentation was presented to the committee to support the report, a copy of which is attached to the minutes.

The Chair, on behalf of the committee, thanked the officers for the detailed report provided, and the presentation presented.

Comments and queries raised from the committee were as follows:

• Due to cultural services being significant drivers of economic output in local communities, the committee was encouraged to see the link between cultural services and economic development, and the continuation of that relationship was emphasised.

• The Creative Step Programme, which was an initiative designed to support and develop creative businesses and individuals within Lancashire, was highlighted for the valuable advice it provided to organisations. It was therefore suggested that more information on the Creative Step Programme, including details of its work and operations, be circulated to the committee.

• Concerns were raised regarding the lack of investment and cultural events in areas such as Preston, and it was noted that the county council had introduced several initiatives, including Crowdfund Lancashire, which had attracted over £1.3 million for community projects across the county, including those within Preston.

• Local Government was the largest investor of culture and the creative arts, and the committee highlighted the importance of ensuring the county council continues to support new organisations and assist in their growth.

• The committee highlighted the need to maintain relations with district councils, and it was noted that the county council worked closely with the district councils, and the district council also had representation on Arts Lancashire, which was a collaborative network that supported and promoted the arts and cultural sector within Lancashire, as well as bringing together various stakeholders, including local authorities, arts organisations, and individual artists, to foster dialogue, share resources, and advocate for the arts. The committee requested more information to be circulated on Creative Lancashire and Arts Lancashire, including what the county council's involvement in those two organisations were.

• The Chair read out comments submitted by County Councillor John Shedwick, Deputy Chair of the Committee, who was unable to attend the meeting. The Deputy Chair was encouraged at the inclusion of 8 new organisations in the Lancashire portfolio, in addition to the 10 existing recipients, and the Deputy Chair noted that Creative Lancashire was collaborating with individuals and organisations on other Arts Council England's Investment Programmes and place-based propositions for Historic England and National Heritage Lottery Fund Programmes.

• The committee explored the idea of using funds from the proceeds of crime to involve more young people in arts and other activities as a way to combat anti-social behaviour. They noted that the previous Police and Crime Commissioner had invited local groups to apply for money from a proceeds of crime fund, which had raised £600,000 from criminal asset seizures for community causes, including cultural events. It was suggested that the committee write to the current Police and Crime Commissioner to ensure this scheme continues.

The Chair thanked the Cabinet Member and officers for their presentation and for answering the committees' questions.

Resolved: That:

1. A briefing note be provided to the committee providing more information on:

2. The Cabinet Member for Communities and Cultural Services gives consideration to writing a letter to the Police and Crime Commissioner to seek support and continuation of the Safer Lancashire Neighbourhoods Fund.

The Chair welcomed County Councillor Alan Vincent, Cabinet Member for Resources, HR and Property (Deputy Leader), Noel O'Neill, Director of Finance and Commerce, and Paul Fairclough, Head of Service Procurement and Contract Management to the meeting. The report presented provided a review of the Procurement Service in the county council. A presentation was presented to the committee to support the report, a copy of which is attached to the minutes.

The Chair, on behalf of the committee, thanked the officers for the detailed report provided, and the presentation presented.

The Chair referred to Lancashire County Council's participation in the Local Government Association Transformation and Innovation Exchange. It was noted that this network will support work on the development of the council's change agenda which is being considered by the Community, Cultural and Corporate Services Scrutiny Committee at its meeting scheduled for 9 December 2024.

Comments and queries raised from the committee were as follows:

·  The committee requested further data be provided on the following:

o  The names of suppliers and the category of Procurement contracts, grouped by the following amounts:

§£1m - £5m

§£500,000 - £1m

o  The numbers of suppliers and the category of Procurement contracts, grouped by the following amounts:

§£250,000 - £500,000

§£100,000 - £500,000

§Below £50,000,

o  For suppliers with a Procurement contract between £1m – 5m and £500,000 - £1m, how many subcontracts each of those contracts had with the county council, and the total value of each of the subcontracts.

· The committee noted that implementation had been delayed, and that further consideration may be needed by the committee should there be any proposed changes that would impact upon the council.

· It was also suggested as an area for improvement that an application be developed to extract procurement contract data from the county council’s systems, allowing users to see what contracts the council had and their respective categories. Additionally, it was noted that when examining the locality of contracts, more attention should be given to smaller contracts rather than large multi-million-pound ones, as the larger contracts typically went to large organisations.

·  Concerns were raised about the locality of contracts being awarded and whether contracts were being awarded more to National organisations, rather than local businesses, and it was noted that this was a potential area for development in terms of understanding the council's spend better. The committee highlighted a need to encourage local businesses to participate in bidding and training, and support processes were necessary to help smaller firms overcome the intimidation of complex bidding forms that were required to fill in.  The Preston Community Wealth model was given as an example to see what lessons could be learnt from the techniques and strategies used by Preston.

· The committee inquired about the level of communication between the procurement team and local organisations during the procurement process and it was noted that during the procurement process and the pre-market engagement, tenders were published, and a “supplier day” was often held, which provided an opportunity for suppliers to learn about upcoming tenders, understand the council’s requirements, and ask any questions. It was suggested that councillors should be informed when supplier days were being held, so they could notify their local businesses in case any of them wanted to bid for the contract.

· It was noted that a new procurement operating model was being developed, with plans to implement a dedicated contract manager resource as part of it. The model was to remain devolved to individual services, but the new resource aimed to enhance the management of strategic contracts and make better use of the council’s data and systems related to contract management. The importance of establishing clear guidance on the contract management strategy at the county council, including defining roles and responsibilities for both procurement and service areas, was emphasised. The committee requested that the updated model be presented at a future meeting.

· The use of ethical contracting in the procurement processes was raised by the committee and it was noted that additional questions had been included on the Procurement questionnaire which potential contract bidders were required to fill in, and it was noted that the service also looked at a range of exclusion criteria's such as checking for potentially disqualified directors and gross misconduct when assessing bids.

·  The committee stressed the importance of monitoring contracts, particularly larger ones, to prevent issues if a business encountered financial difficulties and went into administration, and it was noted that the council used a third-party software provider with a web portal capable of monitoring contracts. Therefore, if the service raised a concern about a contract’s performance, it would trigger an automatic email to the relevant contract manager to assess. The committee proposed a recommendation to seek assurances regarding the governance procedures and competence in monitoring contracts.

· The committee raised concerns about the awarding of contracts under urgency powers instead of the normal route. It was noted that although some contracts were awarded this way, the numbers were minimal. Additionally, any contract awarded under emergency powers that exceeded £75,000 had to be approved by the Cabinet.

· Key Performance Indicators were used in the evaluation of contract performance, and it was noted that there was a requirement under the new Procurement Act for details of contracts worth over £5m be published, which would include details of the contract and details of Key performance indicators.

· A suggestion was made to see if the Lancashire Business Board could promote and support the tendering process, and to offer guidance and support for organisations to help bid for contracts, as previously done by the Lancashire Enterprise Partnership.

The Chair thanked the Cabinet Member and officers for their presentation and for answering the committees' questions.

Resolved: That a future report be made to the committee, to include the following information:

i.  An update on the legislative framework in which procurement operates, the role of procurement and services in the associated activities including any relevant legislative changes and associated implications for the county council's approach.

ii.  Extended data concerning the County Council's spend data, including –

· performance based on supplier locality and the approach taken to the delivery of social value. This information to detail key information by category (including by the following spend bands £1m - £5m; £500k - £1m; £250k - £500K; £100k - £500k; and below £50k); and identify how many are Lancashire based with a significant presence in the county such as distribution sites and offices.

· identifying the multiple contracts that the organisations would possess in the future.

· Financial stability /competence of the suppliers.

iii.  Consideration of the potential for development of an internal enhanced data base application.

iv.  Benchmarking and learning opportunities and identify how the lessons learned have added value at the county council including the Contract Management and learnings that can be gleaned from Preston City Council's Community Wealth Building Model. 

v.  The potential future role of the Lancashire Business Board to promote and support the tendering process, and to offer guidance and support for organisations to help bid for contracts, as previously done by the Lancashire Enterprise Partnership.

vi.  An update on the strategic approach to the contract management function. This information to detail the numbers of contractors working on site at County Hall and the working relationships with those staffs.

vii.  An update on how well the Cabinet Office Centralised Single Platform system is working and the benefits it brings to the county council's processes.

viii. Assurances regarding governance, scrutiny and performance concerning procurement activity and the potential opportunities to enhance the same.

County Councillor Shaun Turner considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £200 to Barton Ladies Social Club towards the cost of a Christmas meal.

This report presents an application from a local organisation requesting £1,000 towards the cost of high quality music concerts from the Local Member Grant Scheme.

County Councillor Ged Mirfin considered and rejected a Local Member Grant to Ribble Valley Music Festival towards the cost of high quality concerts. 

The reason for rejection is the concerts do not take place in County Councillor Mirfin's division.

A decision to approve the establishment of a Dynamic Purchasing System for the procurement of Asphalt, Aggregates and Concrete.

Phil Green, Executive Director of Growth, Environment, Transport & Health took the decision as set out in the report.

A decision taken on the establishment of a framework agreement for the provision of surface carriageway road planning.

Phil Green, Executive Director of Growth, Environment, Transport & Health, took the decision as set out in the report.

A decision on the approval of the Procurement Initiative Plan (PIP) for the provision of establishing a multi-supplier Framework Agreement for Traditional Road Surfacing and Associated Services can commence.

Phil Green, Director of Highways and Transport, took the decision as set out in the report.

A decision taken on the acquisition of a property.

Gary Jones, Estates Manager, on behalf of the Simon Lawrence, Director of Growth and Regeneration, took the decision as set out in the report.

Mike Neville, Senior Democratic Services Officer, authorised County Councillors E Pope and M Clifford (of the Pension Fund Committee) to attend the LGA Governance Conference on 30^th/31^st January 2025 in Bournemouth and for the payment of any associated delegate fees, travel, or accommodation costs as appropriate by the Lancashire County Pension Fund.

Paul Noone, Head of Trading Standards & Scientific Services, on behalf of the Director of Public Health, approved the extension of the contract for Provision of Electrical Services and the Maintenance of Submersible Pumps, Surface Mounted Pumps, Blowers and Compressors with H2O Flowtech Ltd from 1^st May 2025 to 30^th April 2026 as permitted in the current terms and conditions of contract, of which the initial period is due to expire 30^th April 2025.  The extension is compliant with the Council Standing orders and the Public Contract Regulations 2015.

County Councillor Sean Serridge considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £117.65 to Burnley, Pendle and Rossendale Council for Voluntary Service towards the cost of painting and flooring the 'head office' building.

A decision on the authority to seal a S106 agreement to secure a developer contribution from planning application-Land at Tincklers Lane, Chorley, towards the provision of 2 secondary school places.

Noel O'Neill, Director of Finance & Commerce, took the decision as set out in the report.

A decision on the appointment of a contractor to undertake roofing works at White Ash School, Oswaldtwistle.

Noel O'Neill, Interim Director of Finance and Commercialisation, took the decision as set out in the report.

This report is being submitted in accordance with the Scheme of Delegation requirements for the Schools and Operational Buildings Condition Led Programmes (CLP).

Michael Peppin, Capital Programme Manager, took the decision as set out in the report.

Marcus Hudson, Head of Planning & Transport, on behalf of the Andrew Mullaney, Director of Environment and Planning took a decision to approve the waiver of Procurement Rule 9 (ie. three quotes) and procure Love to Ride through via direct award.

A decision taken on the Rawtenstall gyratory.

Andrew Mullaney, Director of Environment and Planning, took the decision as set out in the report.

Ridwan Musa, Head of Service on behalf of the Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport took a decision to approve adjustment of budgets as requested.

A decision taken on Accessible Nelson.

Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport, took the decision as set out in the report.

The Head Of Service  Democratic Services, following consultation with County Councillor Paul Rigby, Champion for Parishes, approved a Champions Grant application of £430 to Inskip-with-Sowerby Parish Council towards the cost of refurbishment of public benches.

The Head of Service Democratic Services, following consultation with County Councillor Paul Rigby, Champion for Parishes, approved a Champions Grant application of £500 to Barnacre with Bonds Parish Council towards the cost of two Christmas trees, lighting and refreshments.

County Councillor Graham Gooch considered and approved a Local Member Grant for the reduced amount of £172 to Hoole Village Hall Bowling Club towards the cost of new equipment.

A decision to approve the Procurement Initiative Plan (PIP) so that tender process to appoint a cleaning services provider for Ribblesdale School, Clitheroe (Secondary Provision) can commence.

Noel O'Neill, Interim Director of Finance and Commerce, took the decision as set out in the report.

It was reported that, since the last meeting of the Development Control Committee on 24 April 2024, seventeen decisions had been taken on development control matters by the Director of Environment and Planning, in accordance with the county council's Scheme of Delegation.

Resolved: That the report be noted. 

A report was presented on an application to increase the width of existing vehicle site access and provision of a pedestrian access gate with footpath at Ringway Tutorial Centre, Ringway, Thornton Cleveleys.

The report included the views of Lancashire County Council Highways. No comments had been provided by Wyre Council. One representation objecting to the application had been received, the details of which were set out in the Committee report.

The Senior Planner presented a Powerpoint presentation showing site location plans and an aerial view of the site, existing site layout, proposed site layout, and photographs of the existing entrance, view looking south along Ringway and view of the side elevation of 123 Ringway.

Resolved: That planning permission be granted subject to conditions controlling time limits, approved plans and surface water drainage, as set out in the Committee report.

A report was presented on an application for an amendment of Condition 6 of planning permission 8/10/0241, to allow approval of amended restoration contours together with the submission of a restoration and aftercare scheme to comply with Conditions 29 and 31 of planning permission 8/10/0241 at Round O Quarry, Cobbs Brow Lane, Lathom.

Committee had undertaken a site visit to Round O Quarry on Monday 15 July 2024.

This planning application had been reported to the meeting of the Development Control Committee on 24 April 2024, when it had been resolved to defer the application to allow the Committee to visit the site. This report had been set out at Appendix 'A.

The county council's Ecologist had visited the site on 22 May 2024 to advise on the current condition of the land and the restoration of the site. The Ecologists comments were set out in the Committee report. It was reported that a revised restoration scheme had now been submitted which included various amendments to the original proposal which were included in the Committee report.

The report included the views of the Greater Manchester Ecological Advisory Service. The views of West Lancashire Borough Council, Newburgh Parish Council, the Environment Agency and the Lancashire Badger Group had been detailed in the April 2024 Committee report, along with the details of the 3 representations objecting to the application.

The Head of Development Control presented a Powerpoint presentation showing site location plans and an aerial view of the application site, plan showing permitted contours, current contours with amended restoration proposals, a 1960's air photograph of the site and photographs of the view from Cobbs Brow Lane looking south and north, the view over the site, the view of the northern side of the site and the view of the western boundary.

Committee's attention was drawn to the Update Sheet which contained amendments to conditions 1b and 2.

Martin Ainscough, adjacent landowner, addressed the Committee and said the following:

'I own the land to the north, to the south, and to the east of Round O Quarry, and I'm really grateful that you've allowed me to speak today. At the last meeting, please remember that there was a huge amount of local objection to this proposal. I hope from your visit to site on Monday, you were able to see the enormous extent of the overtipping. I hope you were shown the conditions that the applicant was meant to have adhered to, and the complete avoidance of any of those conditions having being met. It's quite staggering how much money they've made out of the overtipping there and, more than anything, it's quite staggering that your executive seems to be quite happy to allow this to continue without any penalty and any real wish to see them do any more to improve the site. Thousands of extra movements to fill that quarry have been made to the detriment of the local area in Newburgh, theroads locally. Would it not be sensible to clawback some of that profit that they've made and put a 106 on the site? Or simply to take a bond which will ensure that the conditions that you're imposing are actually complied with. They've shown quite clearly that they ignore everything that this council suggests they should do, and I really, really think that significant management is required to return this site to what they're claiming is a biodiverse site. There is slippage, well you'll have seen, there is a very wet surface to the site, there is no drainage. It is having a severe impact on my land to the north, although there are potatoes growing there this year, there are parts of it that are not done, but most importantly at times of flood the water is just crossing the field and into Newburgh. Something needs to be looked at and nothing has been done. Simply planting 2 hedges is not sufficient - there should be regrading of the site, there should be a look at how the water is going to be controlled. Please don't just accept this.'

The Head of Development Control and the Director of Environment and Planning answered questions from Committee.

It was reported that a paper on the county council's enforcement activity would be discussed at a separate briefing session, to be held on the rising of the next Committee.

Committee raised several concerns around the drainage problems coming from the site. Committee were informed that an extra condition could be attached to the planning permission on how the run off from the site could be controlled.

After a lengthy discussion, it was Proposed and Seconded:

"That the application be deferred and that the applicant be requested to submit a drainage report."

Upon being put to the Vote, the Motion was Carried. It was therefore:

Resolved: That the application be deferred and that the applicant be requested to submit a drainage report. 

Resolved: That the minutes of the meeting held on 24 April 2024 be confirmed and signed by the Chair.

Following a short adjournment, it was confirmed that County Councillor Clarke's declaration of interest as Chair of the Corporate Parenting Board was a non-pecuniary interest and, as such, County Councillor Clarke could exercise his right to vote on this application.

A report was presented on an application for the change of use of an existing residential dwelling house at 23 Hutton Drive, Burnley (planning use class C3(a)) to a children's home (use class C2), to enable the property to be used as a home for up to three young persons between the ages of 11 and 17 years with no more than two carers staying in the property overnight, providing care as required.

The property was in the process of being purchased by the applicant (Lancashire County Council) and the property would operate as a Lancashire County Council care facility.

The report included the views of Burnley Council, Lancashire County Council Policy, Commissioning and Children's Health and Lancashire County Council Highways. 61 representations objecting to the application had been received and 2 letters of support, the details of which were provided in the Committee report.

The Senior Planner presented a Powerpoint presentation showing site location plans and an aerial view of the site, the internal layout, and photographs of the front elevation of the property, side elevation (east facing) of the property, views westwards along Hutton Drive, the view eastwards along Hutton Drive (from adjacent no:9) and the views eastwards from the property and its relationship to no:26 Hutton Drive.

Committee's attention was drawn to the Update Sheet which included details of the petition received requesting refusal of the application and reference to the additional information provided collectively by a number of residents which had been circulated to the Committee. It was reported that the restrictive covenant was a separate issue to the planning application and that this was a private legal matter for Lancashire County Council as landowner and that it was not a material planning consideration.

Elizabeth Grieves, local resident, addressed the Committee and said the following:

'I live at 28 Hutton Drive. I moved here 10 years ago with my husband who is now in a care home with severe Alzheimer's disease, hence I live alone. Whilst I appreciate how difficult it must be to find suitable homes for young people with complex needs, I feel Hutton Drive is an inappropriate setting for them. According to a government website, some behaviours could result in safeguarding risks, such as aggressive, sexualised or offending behaviours, as well as going missing frequently. All of these can make it difficult to keep children safe. Often some behaviours manifest from learning difficulties, autism and ADHD being the most common. Obviously these conditions need specialist help in schools and in this area there is a shortage of places. There are covenants attached to all properties on Hutton Drive, two of which will have an impact on the decision. Covenant B says 'No building on the property shall be used for any purpose other than as or incidental to a private dwelling house.' Covenant E says 'Nothing shall be done or suffered to be done upon the property, which may be to the annoyance, damage, or disturbance of the owners, lessees, tenants, or occupiers of any adjoining or neighbouring property.' The covenants don't allow for a change of use to C2, and also we would like to point out that the property cannot function as a C3 either for the following reasons. Carers who provide 24 hour care but who are not resident cannot be regarded as living together in a household. The concept of living together as a household means that a proper functioning household must exist, and children and carer must reside in the premises. In these circumstances, the use cannot be considered to fall within a C3. The children's home run on shift patterns cannot be considered to fall within class C3 because clearly this is not occupation of a dwelling house by a single person or people living together as a family. I'm also concerned that there appear to be no Burnley councillors on this Committee. Can it be that no Councillor knows the area or has inspected it for suitability? Finally, why, when the house was bought in April 24, did residents only get knowledge of this in late May; surely, before purchase was a time to allow residents to air their views?'

Imtiaz Hussain, local resident, addressed the Committee and said the following:

'My reasons for objecting to 23 Hutton Drive for change of use is as follows. (1) LCC are going to open a business institute in the middle of our residential area (2) the residence clause has already been mentioned (3) we don't know what state of mind these children are in - mental health, emotional, physical, social well-being and the use of revolving door - so it'll be a revolving door, as soon as they get to an age, they get kicked out and some more come in. (4) the house is environmentally in the wrong place - dense woods with the river Calder running through it. Now when it rains, it actually can rise by 4 to 5 feet and it can wash people away. It's very dangerous to say the least. We've also got motorways where people regularly unfortunately end their lives, and I was only just walking yesterday when I've seen new flowers put on the canal and on the walkway bridge. So it's really dangerous for that to be in this place. On Hutton Drive probably 90% of these people are elderly.  Now, I was thirty when I moved there, and most of these people are in their 80s and 95 year old people. So we find it very difficult and most of these people also have other carers because they need care. I know of five people already that their husbands or wives are bed bound, they can't do anything for themselves. I have lived at 26 Hutton Drive since 1991 when it was built. In2009, my late wife was treated in hospital for cancer, she was pregnant with my son.He was delivered at 29 weeks and she was treated for cancer before she passed away.Now my son is severely disabled. He was assaulted by a carer, he has brain damage, he can't walk, he can't talk, he can't eat, he can't do anything but gives me the most gracious smiles when he hears my voice. I left my work ten years ago to look after him. My son has at least 7 to 8 professionals involved with his equipment – oxygen cylinders, beds, all sorts of equipment. There's doctors, nurses, occupational therapists, respiratory professionals, social workers, health workers, management, senior supporters, training staff, school nurses, pharmacists delivering medication, specialised milk, syringes, drainage bags - I can go on and on. Previously, my son had three or four incidents where the ambulance couldn't get through Hutton Drive. They have to stop at the top and they have to come out and support my son because the cars are parked by other people who are there to care for other people. So I please ask everybody to reject this application for the reason that it would put my son's life at risk.'

Anne Marie Parker, local resident, addressed the Committee and said the following:

'My husband and I emailed our objections to Lancashire County Council on 1^st June, following receipt of a brief letter they sent on 16^th May and our research for more detailed information on the plans for no:23. Hopefully, the planning committee will have seen all the objections raised so far. Following other research by our neighbours, we now object to the lack of transparency demonstrated by LCC. They purchased no:23 for £375,000 on 12^th April – something not mentioned in their letter to residents on 16^th May. We must presume, therefore, that they expected no objections from residents of Hutton Drive, or that they believed that you would grant planning permission to change the use of no:23 on the nod. Residents were also not told that if permission is given to change the use of no:23, it can be changed again without LCC needing to consult residents so we have no guarantee as to its long term status. LCC has made much of how no:23 will be just like any other typical family home on Hutton Drive. If that is true, then LCC would not need to make this planning application for a change of use. Therefore, it will not be operating as a typical residential family home. The only actual residents living and sleeping there full time would be 3 children between the ages of 11 and 17. I refer you to the conclusions in the North Devon judgement of 2003 expecting children to look after themselves in a single household is unrealistic. Children need to be looked after, they cannot run a house, they cannot be expected to deal with all the matters that go running a home. Part of LCC's justification in their Market Position Statement of November 2023 is that there are too many agency care homes in this county that do not care exclusively for Lancashire children. This clearly demonstrates LCC's inability to control these practices. I have not seen any reassurances that they have a plan to ensure this situation will be brought under control and prevent it becoming worse. If, in the future, LCC needs to raise money and decides to sell on the business operating at no:23 to an agency, the residents of Hutton Drive have no guarantees that LCC will control its use, based on their performance to date. There will be no safeguards to ensure that our quiet residential area will remain so. In the spirit of our new Government's pledge to ensure that those in public office serve their communities, I urge you to reject this application.'

Nicola Auty, local resident, addressed the Committee and said the following:

'Hutton Drive is a fairly unique avenue in this area as there is  concentration of elderly retirees. I have seen first-hand some of the residents frailties, a number of which live alone and I would say are extremely vulnerable. From a personal perspective, the first floor bedroom windows of no:23 overlook my back garden and once the overgrown trees are cut down at no:23, the front also, I have privacy concerns for my family, my private life and that of my home. Given the nature of the proposal, I feel it would be an unjustifiable intrusion – please see submitted pictures. Guidance for children's homes state is it needed locally? Is it safe? Is it in the right place? Does it promote positive opportunities for children? I don't think any of these boxes can be ticked. Is it needed locally? There's already four times the number of care homes needed in Lancashire. There's already an Ofsted children's care home 500 metres from the proposed property. There's also a Stepping Stones project for young individuals less than 500 metres away. Is it in the right place? It's incompatible with the residential character of the area and would have a harmful impact upon nearby neighbouring residents by virtue of noise and disturbance. There is insufficient parking at the property - please see submitted picture. There is a shortage of SEN schools in the area. Is it safe? There appears to have been no input from the police on their views on its suitability; they can advise on local criminal activity and exploitation risks such as grooming, gangs. We already know there are criminal hotspots in Burnley town centre which is less than a mile away. Does it promote positive opportunities for children? Positive peer interaction will be limited, due to the demographic of the residents. In conclusion, I understand it's very difficult to find suitable homes. However, I don't think Lancashire County Council have carried out enough due diligence on no:23. I would respectfully request the application is declined as it has restrictive covenants that run with the deeds of the property restricting its use to a dwelling house only - please see submitted document. It's not safe. It has too many accessible environmental dangers, which could ultimately lead to tragic outcomes - please see submitted images. It's not in the right place. It's in the middle of elderly and vulnerable people which most would agree is totally inappropriate.'

Cindy Whittle, local resident, addressed the Committee and said the following:

'I've been a social worker in Burnley for 12 years. I previously worked on the child protection children in our care team and within the court arena. I am concerned regarding first-hand experience of working with children in care and the issues that some of these children may display by way of complex mental health needs and high risk of exploitation. During my time on the children in care team I have faced verbal and physical abuse, been spit at and kicked. 23 Hutton Drive is across the road from my house and I can see it quite clearly. Living near a children's home might expose me to challenging situations - there is every chance that, in time, children may move into the home who I have previously worked with. This could cause serious ramifications. Statistics show that, on average, a social worker is assaulted every 30 minutes in the UK. Sadly, this only begins to illustrate the scale of risk I could possibly face. I am quite recognisable due to a private car registration which is in full view of the potential parents who could visit the home. There is also the risk that relatives could potentially want information about their children and there is always the fear of what these relatives may do. This may ultimately impact on my safety and emotional wellbeing. I am aware of the precautions LCC put into place to safeguard social workers and the hazards they may face related to violence and aggression. I feel living near a children's home I might find it challenging to disconnect with my professional responsibilities. Also, the government Security Clearing Corporation have guidelines on professional boundaries following issues of proximity being cited as a factor of social workers living near a children's home. Employers have a duty to protect social workers by reducing the risk of physical and verbal abuse, and a condition to provide support and opportunities for staff to maintain their well-being. There is every chance that opening the children's home may impact and blur boundaries between my work and professional life. I believe everyone deserves to live and feel safe within their own home and be supported that the physical and mental well-being for social workers living in close proximity of the potential risk myself and my family may incur, to be taken into consideration. There is a high risk of the children being groomed and exploited. There is also probation bail accommodationwithin walking distance of Hutton Drive, which is a risk to these children and many of the vulnerable residents on Hutton Drive. Should any of the children be reported missing there's a protocol to call the police.'

Councillor Don Whitaker, Burnley Borough Council, addressed the Committee and said the following:

'First of all, a lot of the things I was going to say have already been spoken about by the residents who I think you will agree, have been quite upfront about how they feel about this application. About myself, I am the borough councillor for this particular ward, I'm a retired police officer who's seen first-hand the consequences of antisocial behaviour, criminality, lots of other things caused by children with complex issues. I was first contacted about this application the moment it went in. When I say contacted, I was inundated, literally inundated by emails, people calling me. I attended a residents meeting; it wasn't just 10 or 15 people, but the room was full. The room is two or three times the size of this cabinet room. I genuinely listened to what the people had to say. The residents of that area, and I don't say this lightly, they do all firmly object to it for valid reasons which are placed here today before you. For reference, you can see on the map behind us there where Hutton Drive is,  people have spoken about safety of people and children especially there. Just next to that red block you will see there's a small footpath that leads directly to the canal. It also leads directly to the M65 motorway and towards the river. I'm sorry to say that tragically over the last couple of years, especially since the pandemic, several people have committed suicide in that area. Most of those people did not have complex mental health issues that we are aware of. These children, we are aware that they do have these issues at this moment in time. My main fear is not just for the residents who I am pretty certain from my experience in the police will be subjected to increased criminality, anti-social behaviour, is for the children that are going to be at that home. From the papers I've read they are supervised whilst they're in the property but when they're not in the property, i.e going to school, etc, they're not. So what's going to happen to these children if they are unsupervised and they've got access to so many dangers that are around them? I've seen enough death in Burnley in this area, I don't want to see young children throwing themselves off bridges or running in front of motorways. Your own policy for highways states that it can have an abject affect. This sounds awful, but if a motorway is closed, it has a massive economic effect. When motorways are closed for suicides, they're closed for long periods of time, I don't want to see that happening to the economy, I don't want to see it happening to the children in that area and I certainly don't want the residents I represent in Whittlefield and Ightenhill to be subjected to an increase in criminality and anti-social behaviour in that area.'

County Councillor Scott Cunliffe, local councillor for Burnley Central West, addressed the Committee and said the following:

'In a previous life, I worked in conflict zones and suffered a lot of PTSD, and when bridges come into mind, I still get suicidal tendencies. They are specifically deep for vulnerable people for going over bridges. I've never walked, I daren't walk over those bridges, so that reiterates a little bit of what Councillor Whitaker was saying then.Now when we look at these vulnerable people, I don't think we're actually here today to discuss the need. I agree there is a need - even yesterday, Lancashire County Council launched a new campaign for foster parents to come forward in the area, and I think that's a massive part of the policy which was not referred to, that we are really pushing for foster parents, and I think foster homes are a better solution to this. Why I'm objecting to this is because, not just around the need and the policy, but it's not a suitable location. Now if we span out on Google Earth further into Burnley Central West, my division, just over the motorway bridge as we go into the town centre you've got a need for dealing with many vulnerable people who are in institutions, you've got a drug rehabilitation centre and another residential home for people coming back from drug addiction. That's within walking distance of those bridges you cross over. On a recent litter pick around there, how many hundreds of needles did we uncover and gas canisters in the bushes surrounding that area? This highlights the area, not just the residential area, but the area coming further afield round there. Now we've also got to look at the loss of amenity, which the residents so eloquently covered in their objections. But thirdly, when we're looking at change of use, and I think once it goes into a C2 and I think, rightly we've got to point out what C2 is, and C2 is a residential institution, it's not going from a residential to a residential home, it's going to a residential institution and a previous speaker was rightly pointing out that once it's changed, it's very difficult to change it back. This is a place of work essentially for a lot of people, and once it goes to a place of work, it can't go back. So it's a serious point of balance to take in, I think for Members looking at this. Also, the selection criteria is market driven on here. This post code is one of the poorest postcodes in the country, so you get very few of these sort of houses in Burnley's local plan. There's no one building this size house in Burnley's local plan and I've been on planning at Burnley for the last three years until May. Now, the selection for its criteria - it came up for sale - if it hadn't come up for sale, it wouldn't have happened there. It's clearly market driven.'

Amanda Barbour, Head of Service, Fostering, Adoption Lancashire Blackpool and Residential Services, addressed the Committee and said the following:

'I represent Lancashire County Council as a Head of Children's Residential Services. Lancashire County Council have 12 Ofsted registered children's homes across Lancashire. These provide a home for 52 of our children who cannot safely live at home with their families. Where Our Children Live is a programme of work that's been designed to support the vision of Lancashire homes for Lancashire children, and create more homes for our children who need them. We have decades of experience in managing children's homes and the trauma response behaviours of our children in these homes. Our staff are highly trained and skilled and we have some amazing partnerships and links with specialist support services across the whole county, who we work really closely with. We also have some really positive relationships with our neighbours. In our home in Chorley, our home manager visits our neighbours twice a year as check-ins, and invites the neighbours into the home to meet the staff team and young people. In one of our homes in Lancaster, we have a really close relationship with our 82 year old neighbour. Our young people take gifts and cards at Christmas and Easter, and we cut her adjoining hedge and also do the occasional odd job for her. In our home in Preston, one of our young people recently sent a bunch of flowers to the neighbour when she heard that she was unwell. We also encourage our young people to make a positive contribution to the community. Our young people in Lancaster donate their activity money at Christmas to buy a food shop for the local food bank, and they purchase from their own pocket money Christmas gifts for the elderly. A number of our young people have completed various sponsored events for local charities in the areas which they live. Some of our young people in Nelson and Thornton bake cakes and deliver them to the local care home for the elderly. Our young people in Accrington and other homes support the Cards for Kindness Appeal each year. These are just a handful of examples. As a local authority provider, we take our responsibilities very seriously - our responsibilities to Lancashire children, to Lancashire residents and to all the communities across Lancashire. We understand and appreciate the worries and concerns of local residents on Hutton Drive. However, we are committed to working together with the local community, as we do with all our children's homes, to be good neighbours and a valued part of the wider community. In summary, our proposal is seeking to provide a Lancashire home for three Lancashire children. These are our children who need us to look after them. They need stability, opportunities and, most of all, a place they can call home.'

The Senior Planner answered questions from Committee.

County Councillor Clarke wished to place on record that he would not be exercising his right to vote on this application.

After a discussion, it was:

Resolved: That planning permission be granted subject to conditions controlling time limit, approved plans, restricting the use to a children's home only, as set out in the Committee report and installation of a vehicle charging point.

A report was presented on a proposal to dedicate a public footpath under the 1980 Highways Act Section 25 to provide a level access entrance / exit between Squires Gate railway station and New Road.

It was reported that the Squires Gate railway station was unstaffed and currently had one entry / exit point at Squires Gate Lane with a steep flight of stairs from the platform, which posed challenges for individuals with mobility issues, wheelchair users, parents with prams and passengers with luggage.

The aim of the wider Squires Gate Level Access project was to enhance accessibility at the Railway Station, and to make the facility more inclusive to the local community.

Progress towards achieving level access to the platform had begun in 2018, when the potential for creating a new inclusive route from nearby New Road had been identified through a new housing estate proposed by Persimmon Homes.  Fylde Borough Council had initiated Compulsory Purchase Order proceedings to acquire a small piece of land which had previously been unregistered, to link New Road to the southern end of Squires Gate Railway Station. The Compulsory Purchase Order process had been completed in August 2023.

Lancashire County Council as the Local Transport Authority for the area were developing the wider project in partnership with Northern Trains and Network Rail. Various processes were now required to enable the Level Access project package to be delivered.

A discussion took place around the poor state of the garages adjacent to the proposed footpath and the need to ensure the safety of the footpath users. Committee noted that these concerns would be drawn to the attention of the Highways Design Team.

Resolved:

(i)  That the proposal for the dedication of footpath from New Road to Squires Gate railway station be accepted.

(ii)  That an Agreement be entered into, pursuant to Section 25 of the Highways Act 1980, with freehold landowners Persimmon Homes and Fylde Borough Council.

A report was presented on an application for the diversion of part of Footpath FP0919005 at The Old Rectory, Mawdesley.

The length of existing path to be diverted was shown on the Committee plan attached to the agenda papers as a bold continuous line and marked A-B, and the proposed alternative route was shown as a bold broken line and marked C-D-E-B.

Consultations with the statutory undertakers and the Lancashire County Council Ecology Officer had been carried out and no objections or adverse comments on the proposal had been received. The Lancashire County Council Ecology Officer had given some specific advice for the applicant to follow in relation to protected species and the bird nesting season, should the Order be made and before construction. Details of these were set out in the report.

It was reported that the proposed diversion was considered expedient in the interests of the owners of the land for reasons of privacy and security. The Old Rectory is a private, residential property. Currently, the public footpath ran along the access drive and close to the dwelling of The Old Rectory and immediately adjacent to the garage and outbuildings.

The diversion would instead move the start of the footpath 165m further south on High Street running in an easterly direction on the northern side of the boundary between The Old Rectory and Mawdesley Cricket Club, then south to continue for 20m alongside the eastern boundary of the Cricket Club, before turning to continue in a broadly east-south-easterly direction to rejoin the existing route on the access drive at SD 4915 1420. This would significantly increase the privacy and security of the residential dwelling, whilst providing a route that was safe, convenient and as direct for public use.

The officer answered questions from Committee.

Resolved:

(i)  That an Order be made under Section 119 of the Highways Act 1980 to divert part of Footpath FP0919005 from the route shown by a bold continuous line and marked A-B to the route shown by a bold broken line and marked C-B on the attached map.

(ii)  That in the event of no objections being received, the Order be confirmed and in the event of objections being received and not withdrawn, the Order be sent to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Authority take a neutral stance with respect to its confirmation.

(iii)  That provision be included in the Order such that it is also made under Section 53A of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, to amend the Definitive Map and Statement of Public Rights of Way in consequence of the coming into operation of the diversion.

A report was presented on an application for the diversion of part of Footpath FP0325018 at The Old Coach House, Saccary Lane, Mellor.

The length of existing path to be diverted was shown on the Committee plan attached to the agenda papers as a bold continuous line and marked A-B, and the proposed new route was shown by a bold broken line and marked E-D-C-B.

The consultation with the statutory undertakers had been carried out and no objections or adverse comments on the proposal had been received. The Lancashire County Council Ecology Officer had commented that the works should avoid the removal of any mature trees which may be suitable to support roosting bats, and that all vegetation removal works must be undertaken outside the bird nesting season (March to August inclusive).

It was reported that the proposed diversion was considered expedient in the interests of the owners of the land for reasons of privacy and security. The Old Coach House is a private, residential property. Currently, the legal line of the public footpath ran along the garden and close to the dwelling of The Old Coach House. The residents had reported various incidents of abuse of the public rights and wished to segregate the public footpath from the garden.

The diversion would move the footpath to the south end of the garden of The Old Coach House, then following the edge of the adjacent pasture to continue on footpath FP0333006 northwards. This would significantly increase the privacy and security of the residential dwelling, whilst providing a route that was safe and convenient for public use.

The officer answered questions from Committee.

Following a discussion, it was Proposed and Seconded that the following further recommendation be added:

"(iv) That before the route is certified, officers ensure that improvements are made so that the public are not inconvenienced by the surface condition between B and C."

Upon being put to the Vote, the Motion was Carried.

It was therefore:

Resolved:

(i)  That an Order be made under Section 119 of the Highways Act 1980 to divert part of Footpath FP0325018 from the route shown by a bold continuous line and marked A-B to the route shown by a bold broken line and marked E-D-C-B on the attached map.

(ii)  That in the event of no objections being received, the Order be confirmed and in the event of objections being received and not withdrawn, the Order be sent to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Authority take a neutral stance with respect to its confirmation.

(iii)  That provision be included in the Order such that it is also made under Section 53A of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, to amend the Definitive Map and Statement of Public Rights of Way in consequence of the coming into operation of the diversion.

(iv)  That before the route is certified, officers ensure that improvements are made so that the public are not inconvenienced by the surface condition between B and C.

A report was presented on an application for the diversion of part of Footpath FP0303024 at Green Thorn Farm Aighton, Bailey and Chaigley Parish, Hurst Green.

The length of existing path to be diverted was shown on the Committee plan attached to the agenda papers as a bold continuous line and marked A-B, and the proposed alternative route was shown by a bold broken line and marked A-C-D-B.

Consultations with the statutory undertakers and the Lancashire County Council Ecology Officer had been carried out and no objections or adverse comments on the proposal had been received.

It was reported that the proposed diversion was considered expedient in the interests of the owners of the land for reasons of privacy and security. Green Thorn Farm is a private, residential property. Currently, the public footpath ran through the grounds of the farm close to its western boundary, then turned to continue close to the dwelling and outbuildings of the farm, before continuing in a northerly direction to re-enter the forest.

The diversion would instead move the footpath closer to the western boundary of Green Thorn Farm continuing on a line on the eastern side of, and broadly parallel to, the western boundary, before exiting the grounds of Green Thorn Farm onto a track continuing in a broadly north-easterly direction through the forest to a point at SD 6651 4076, 150m north of Green Thorn Farm boundary, to continue on footpath FP0303024. This would significantly increase the privacy and security of the residential dwelling, whilst providing a route that was safe, convenient and as direct for public use.

The officer answered questions from Committee.

Resolved:

(i)  That an Order be made under Section 119 of the Highways Act 1980 to divert part of Footpath FP0303024 from the route shown by a bold continuous line and marked A-B to the route shown by a bold broken line and marked A-C-D-B on the attached map.

(ii)  That in the event of no objections being received, the Order be confirmed and in the event of objections being received and not withdrawn, the Order be sent to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Authority take a neutral stance with respect to its confirmation.

(iii)  That provision be included in the Order such that it is also made under Section 53A of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, to amend the Definitive Map and Statement of Public Rights of Way in consequence of the coming into operation of the diversion.

A report was presented on an application for the diversion of part of Footpath FP0106009 at Monkswell, Bolton-le-Sands.

The length of existing path to be diverted was shown on the Committee plan attached to the agenda papers as a bold continuous line and marked A-B, and the proposed alternative route was shown by a bold broken line and marked C-D-B.

Consultations with the statutory undertakers and the Lancashire County Council Ecology Officer had been carried out and no objections or adverse comments on the proposal had been received.

It was reported that the proposed diversion was considered expedient in the interests of the owners of the land for reasons of privacy and security. Monkswell is a private, residential property. Currently, the public footpath ran along the access drive of Monkswell immediately adjacent to the dwelling.

The diversion would instead start from a point 35 metres further north-east on Bye-Pass Road, continuing north-west for 15 metres, then west-south-west for a further 10 metres over St Michael's River via a bridge to rejoin the original line of FP0106009. This would significantly increase the privacy and security of the residential dwelling, whilst providing a route that was safe, convenient and generally as direct for public use.

Resolved:

(i)  That an Order be made under Section 119 of the Highways Act 1980 to divert part of Footpath FP0106009 from the route shown by a bold continuous line and marked A-B to the route shown by a bold broken line and marked C-D-B on the attached plan.

(ii)  That in the event of no objections being received, the Order be confirmed and in the event of objections being received and not withdrawn, the Order be sent to the Secretary of State and the Authority take a neutral stance with respect to its confirmation.

(iii)  That provision be included in the Order such that it is also made under Section 53A of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, to amend the Definitive Map and Statement of Public Rights of Way in consequence of the coming into operation of the diversion.

A report was presented on an application for the extinguishment of part of Footpath FP1404038 at Middlegate Green, Loveclough, Rawtenstall, Rossendale Borough.

A revised Committee plan and larger scale plan had been circulated to members (copies attached).

The length of existing path to be extinguished was shown on the Committee plan attached to the agenda papers as a bold continuous line and marked as A-B.

Consultations with the statutory undertakers and the Lancashire County Council Ecology Officer had been carried out and no objections or adverse comments on the proposal had been received.

It was reported that the proposed extinguishment of footpath FP1404038 was considered expedient on the grounds that this part of the footpath was not needed for public use. No.11 Middlegate Green is a private, residential property fronted by a footway that provided a route that was safe and convenient for public use, although longer in length, making the residual short length of footpath redundant. It was expedient in the interests of the owners of the land for reasons of privacy and security that this duplicate 30m of pedestrian rights be stopped up.

The officer answered questions from Committee.

After a discussion, it was:

Resolved:

(i)  That an Order be made under Section 118 of the Highways Act 1980 to extinguish part of Footpath FP1404038 shown by a bold continuous line and marked A-B on the attached map.

(ii)  That in the event of no objections being received, the Order be confirmed and in the event of objections being received and not withdrawn, the Order be sent to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Authority take a neutral stance with respect to its confirmation.

(iii)  That provision be included in the Order such that it is also made under Section 53A of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, to amend the Definitive Map and Statement of Public Rights of Way in consequence of the effect of the Order.

A report was presented on the proposed concurrent extinguishment and creation of part of Footpath FP0339018 at Old Sawley Grange, Gisburn Road, Sawley, Clitheroe, BB7 4LH, Ribble Valley Borough.

The length of existing footpath to be extinguished was shown on the Committee plan attached to the agendas papers as a bold continuous line marked A-B, and the footpath to be created was shown by a bold dashed line marked C-B.

Consultations with the statutory undertakers and Lancashire County Council Ecology Officer had been carried out and no objections or adverse comments on the proposal had been received.

It was reported that the proposed extinguishment was considered expedient on the grounds that this part of the footpath was not needed for public use. The current right of way, from a point at SD 7928 4680 within the footprint of the building of Old Sawley Grange, in an easterly direction, crossing a telecommunications mast access track, a boundary fence and into a pasture, to meet the access track at SD 7947 4679 would be made redundant by the concurrent creation under a Section 26 Order, on a more practical and convenient line. It was expedient in the interests of the owners of the land for reasons of a property sale that these rights be stopped up (as was the intention of a 2000 Diversion Order).

The creation of the footpath section was being sought because it appeared that there was a need for this public right of way, having regard to the extent to which it would add to the convenience or enjoyment of persons resident in the area, and having regard to the effect of the owners of the land, who needed the situation to be rectified.

Resolved:

(i)  That an Order(s) be made under Sections 26 and 118 of the Highways Act 1980 to extinguish part of Footpath FP0339018 shown by a bold continuous line and marked A-B on the attached map and to create a footpath shown by a bold broken line C-B.

(ii)  That in the event of no objections being received, the Order(s) be confirmed and in the event of objections being received and not withdrawn, the Order(s) be sent to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and the Authority promote confirmation.

(iii)  That provision be included in the Order(s) such that it is also made under Section 53A of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, to amend the Definitive Map and Statement of Public Rights of Way in consequence of the effect of the Order(s).

It was reported that this item had been withdrawn.

A report was presented on an application for the addition of a Restricted Byway along part of Green Lane, Skerton, Lancaster to the Definitive Map and Statement of Public Rights of Way. The restricted byway to be added was shown on the Committee plan attached to the agenda papers between points A-B-C.

A variety of maps, plans and other documents had been examined to discover when the route came into being, and to try to determine what its status may be.

Committee were advised that there was sufficient evidence that this route was already regarded as part of the highway network in the early nineteenth century, and continued to be recorded as such on the various documents and that on balance, a dedication by an owner over 200 years ago could be inferred.

Committee were informed that the legal maxim "once a highway always a highway" would apply and the fact that the application route was not presently recorded did not mean that it did not carry public rights of way.

In addition, Committee were informed that should they consider that an Order be made to record this old route as restricted byway, it was advised that the evidence was sufficiently strong for the Order to be promoted to confirmation.

Resolved:

(i)  That the application for a Restricted Byway to be added to the Definitive Map and Statement of Public Rights of Way be accepted.

(ii)  That an Order be made pursuant to Section 53 (2)(b) and Section 53 (3)(c)(i) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 to add a Restricted Byway along part of Green Lane, Skerton on the Definitive Map and Statement of Public Rights of Way as shown on Committee Plan between points A-B-C.

(iii)  That being satisfied that the higher test for confirmation can be met the Order be promoted to confirmation.

A report was presented on an application for the addition of a bridleway across Aikengill Dub from Aikengill Road to the junction of Ringstones Lane and Slaidburn Road, Tatham to the Definitive Map and Statement of Public Rights of Way. The bridleway to be added was shown on the Committee plan attached to the agenda papers between points A-B.

A variety of maps, plans and other documents had been examined to discover when the route came into being, and to try to determine what its status may be.

Committee were informed that, in conclusion, it appeared from the early map evidence that the application route had been used by vehicles however, the terrain along the application route may also have meant that the route had been more likely to be used on horseback or with packhorses. The fact that an alternative route had been created and subsequently maintained suggested, on balance, that carts which had used it as part of a longer through route had probably begun to struggle across the application route, and it was easier to provide a new link than try to improve the application route. However, there was no evidence to substantiate this further.

Committee were advised that, on balance, it seemed that the application route was a public vehicular highway and that dedication of public carriageway rights may therefore be inferred. It was reported that the implication of section 67 Natural Environment Rural Communities Act 2006 meant that any existing public rights of way for mechanically propelled vehicles had been extinguished so a recording of restricted byway would be appropriate.

It was therefore suggested to Committee that after careful consideration having taken all the map and documentary evidence into account, they may consider there was sufficient evidence from which to infer dedication of public carriageway rights and that an Order be made for restricted byway and that it be promoted to confirmation.

Resolved:

(i)  That the application for the addition to the Definitive Map and Statement of a bridleway from Aikengill Road to the junction of Ringstones Lane and Slaidburn Road, Tatham be accepted subject to the higher restricted byway rights being recorded.

(ii)  That an Order be made pursuant to Section 53 (2)(b) and Section 53 (3)(c)(i) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 to add a restricted byway from Aikengill Road to the junction of Ringstones Lane and Slaidburn Road, Tatham on the Definitive Map and Statement of Public Rights of Way as shown on Committee Plan between points A-B.

(iii)  That being satisfied that the higher test for confirmation can be met the Order be promoted to confirmation.

A report was presented on an application for the upgrading of footpaths and addition of bridleway between Fish Lane and Curlew Lane, Burscough to the Definitive Map and Statement of Public Rights of Way. The upgrading of part of footpaths FP0818135 and FP0818134 to bridleway were shown on the Committee plan attached to the agenda papers between points A-B, C-E and E-F-G-H-I respectively, and the bridleway to be added was shown between points B-C and C-D.

Various maps, plans and other documents had been examined to discover when the route came into being, and to try to determine what its status may be.

On balance and given the nature of the evidence, Committee considered that the evidence of the application route having become a public bridleway was sufficient. However, there was some debate about whether that evidence showed that the way should be recorded as a restricted byway, as opposed to a bridleway, as it was thought there was sufficient evidence of vehicular use and that the route carried higher rights.

The officer answered questions from Committee.

After a discussion, it was Proposed and Seconded that:

"Part of FP0818135 (A-B and C-E) and FP0818134 (E-F-G-H-I) be upgraded to restricted byway and that a restricted byway be added between points B-C and C-D on the Definitive Map and Statement of Public Rights of Way".

Upon being put to the Vote, the Motion was Carried.

It was therefore:

Resolved:

(i)  That the application for the upgrading of footpaths and addition of a bridleway between Fish Lane and Curlew Lane, Burscough to the Definitive Map and Statement of Public Rights of Way, be accepted, subject to restricted byway rights also being recorded.

(ii)  That an Order(s) be made pursuant to Section 53 (2)(b) and/or Section 53 (3)(c)(i) and (ii) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 to upgrade part of FP0818135 (A-B and C-E) and FP0818134 (E-F-G-H-I) to restricted byway and to add a restricted byway between points B-C and C-D on the Definitive Map and Statement of Public Rights of Way.

(iii)  That being satisfied that the higher test for confirmation can be met the Order be promoted to confirmation.

A report was presented setting out the constitution, membership, Terms of Reference of the Regulatory Committee, and the programme of meetings for 2024/25.

Resolved:

The Committee:

(i)  Noted the constitution/membership of the Committee, following appointments at the county council's annual meeting on 23 May 2024.

(ii)  Agreed to comply with the Terms of Reference of the Committee.

(iii)  Noted the agreed programme of meetings for the Committee.

A report was presented on an update of the progress made in relation to matters previously considered by Committee.

Committee noted that although the term 'applications' had been used for convenience these were not all formal applications made under Schedule 14 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 but included some cases where sufficient evidence had been discovered or presented to the county council to indicate an investigation was appropriate.

Resolved:

Committee considered the report and had no comments to make.

Ridwan Musa, Head of Service, on behalf of the Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport took a decision to approve transfer of budgets as required.

Ridwan Musa, Head of Service, on behalf of the Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport took a decision to approve adjustments of budgets as required.

A decision taken on the direct award of level 6 senior procurement or supply chain professional apprenticeship.

Rachel Rump, Head of Talent and Performance, took the decision as set out in the report.

A decision taken on a direct award for Urban Driver and LGV Level 2 Apprenticeships.

Rachel Rump, Head of Talent and Performance, took the decision as set out in the report.

Khadija Saeed on behalf of the Director of Finance and Commerce took a decision to extend the contract for provision of Domestic Property Valuation Services with Holdens from 1st October 2024 to 31st March 2025 as permitted in the current terms and conditions of contract.  The extension is compliant with the Council Standing orders and EU Procurement Laws.

County Councillor Alan Whittaker considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £400 to St Agnes RC Church towards the cost of a defibrillator.

County Councillor Shaun Turner considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £400 to Calder Vale Village Hall towards the cost of replacing the public toilet flat roof.

County Councillor Kim Snape considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £300 to Lancashire TAAG Achievements towards the cost of running special sessions.

County Councillor Barrie Yates considered and rejected a Local Member Grant to Lancashire TAAG Achievements towards the cost of an awards evening for members.

The reason for rejection is County Councillor Yates is reserving his remaining funding to support organisations that will benefit his division more directly.

County Councillor Graham Gooch considered and rejected a Local Member Grant to Lancashire TAAG Achievements towards the cost of an awards evening.

The reason for rejection is County Councillor Graham Gooch wishes to support local organisations that benefit his division directly.

County Councillor Anna Hindle considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £200 to Lancashire TAAG Tigers towards the cost of running special monthly events.

County Councillor John Potter considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £200 to Lancashire TAAG Tigers towards the cost of special monthly events.

County Councillor Barrie Yates considered and approved a Local Member Grant for the reduced amount of £200 to Lancashire TAAG towards the cost of special monthly meetings.

County Councillor Graham Gooch considered and rejected a Local Member Grant to Lancashire TAAG towards the cost of monthly special events.

The reason for rejection is County Councillor Graham Gooch wished to support local organisations that directly benefit his division.

The Chair welcomed County Councillor Rupert Swarbrick, Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport, Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport, Andrew Varley, Head of Service Public and Integrated Transport, and Matthew Moll, Enhanced Bus Partnership Manager to the meeting.

A presentation was provided to the committee giving an overview of the Bus Service Improvement Plan. The report and presentation outlined the improvements that had been delivered to date and ambitions post 2025. A copy of the presentation is set out in the minutes.

Comments and queries raised from the committee were as follows:

·  Regarding consultation with operators and bus user groups, it was queried whether district councils and county councillors were consulted. One member's understanding was that the Enhanced Partnership Forum membership consisted mainly of bus operators. Officers confirmed that the forum was an open forum Chaired by the Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport, for which invites were issued to district councils, bus operators and the Lancaster District Bus User Group to attend. Efforts would be made to improve the distribution list.

·  The recent appointment of the Enhanced Bus Service Partnership Manager to the service had enabled improved information dissemination, though it was acknowledged that past communication may not have been optimal.

·  It was confirmed that negotiations with transport operators to engage them in the 'Any Bus' scheme were ongoing, and that the ticket was a long-term aspiration. In response to questions of the Any Bus ticket's reach, officers highlighted that the aim was to roll out the scheme to all services across the county over the next two years. The Fylde Coast ‘Any Bus’ scheme would include tram services. The inclusion of ferries was an ambition but not currently planned.

·  It was noted that most rural bus services were tendered services, and any commercial operator could make a bid to run those.

·  If funding for the BSIP was successful, the plan would aim to enhance existing service frequencies or introduce additional services in rural areas.

·  Service improvements would also include the enhancement of real-time information and live updates.

·  The five ‘super’ bus routes were those inter-urban routes covering significant distances such as between Preston and Southport and Morecambe and Carnforth. On the latter route, officers were identifying opportunities and in talks with the operator to link into the Lake District and the forthcoming Eden Project in Morecambe.

·  Gaps in the network were being identified and there was an ambition to increase rural service provision. However, it was reported that the last bid submitted for funding was significantly higher than what was received, which therefore limited what could be achieved in terms of enhancements across the county.

·  Running services on Sundays was dependent on future sustainability as providing these services was getting more expensive.

·  Members highlighted the need for better information at bus stops and improvements in the communication of short-notice suspensions and disruptions to services. It was confirmed that efforts are being made to improve the system of information for bus users across different operators and that officers were in the process of developing a multi-operator app.

·  On the removal of bus shelters, it was confirmed that the county council would work with bus shelter owners, such as Parish Councils, to maintain and maximise provision.

·  Members highlighted issues with transport services in Rossendale, such as the lack of trams or trains, sparse bus services, and no direct links to hospitals. Concerns were also expressed about the number of enhancements made to services in Rossendale. 

Resolved: That the Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport be asked to consider:

(i)  Giving more priority and funding to improving bus service provision in rural areas and provision in the Rossendale district.

(ii)  Strengthening consultation with County Councillors on the bus service consultation process.

(iii)Reviewing and expanding the distribution list for the Enhanced Partnership Forum and to include County Councillors.

The Chair welcomed County Councillor Rupert Swarbrick, Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport, and Kirstie Williams, Highways Group Manager – County Wide Maintenance, to the meeting.

A progress report was presented to the committee on the implementation of agreed actions following the recommendations of the Public Realm Agreements Task Group report as adopted by the Environment, Economic Growth and Transport Scrutiny Committee.

The committee was informed that a number of actions had been completed apart from five actions that were marked as in progress. It was reported that all five outstanding actions related to the requirement for the Public Realm (Section 101) Agreements to be approved by Cabinet. There was an aim for these Agreements to be presented to Cabinet at its meeting scheduled for 16 January 2025.

On the offer to parish and town councils to apply for direct allocations to carry out public realm work, it was reported that following the email sent out to all parish and town councils on 17 November 2023, five had expressed an interest. To date only two of those, including Weeton with Preese Parish Council had been added to the list of providers in 2024/25. It was acknowledged that making a further offer to all parish and town councils could be beneficial.

It was suggested that the progress report be brought annually to the committee for consideration. Updated budget allocations for 2024/25 and where possible projections for 2025/26 for districts and parish and town councils would be circulated to members following the meeting. The list of parish and town councils undertaking public realm work would also be amended.

Resolved: That;

(i)  The Progress Report be noted.

(ii)  A further progress report be scheduled at an appropriate time in 2025.

(iii)Budget allocations for 2024/25 and projected budget allocations for 2025/26 along with an updated list of Parish and Town Council allocations be circulated to all members of the Committee.

Resolved: That the;

(i)  Appointment of County Councillor R Bailey as Chair and County Councillor S Rigby as Deputy Chair of the Environment, Economic Growth and Transport Scrutiny Committee for the 2024-25 municipal year be noted.

(ii)  Membership of the committee, following the county council's Annual Meeting held 23 May 2024 be noted.

(iii)Environment, Economic Growth and Transport Scrutiny Committee Terms of Reference be noted.

The Chair welcomed County Councillor Aidy Riggott, Cabinet Member for Economic Development and Growth, and Andrew Mullaney, Director of Environment and Planning to the meeting.

A presentation was provided on the preparation of the Local Transport Plan 4 (LTP), a document that is a statutory requirement of authorities and a key enabler for economic development and housing growth. The report detailed the proposed objectives of the LTP 4, as well as challenges that were anticipated. A copy of the presentation is set out in the minutes.

In response to questions from the committee, the following information was clarified:

·  On the five ongoing transport masterplans under the previous LTP 3 it was explained that they would form part of the review element of LTP 4.

·  The committee was informed that if the combined county authority (CCA) proposal got the go ahead, this work would become the responsibility of the CCA in its role as the local transport authority.

·  It was acknowledged that there were many challenges with delivering bus service provision in rural areas of Lancashire and that all related plans including the Bus Service Improvement Plan should align to the same ultimate objectives.

·  Members queried the term 'key centres' used in the report regarding upcoming transport objectives to enable better public transport connections. Officers explained that key centres did not exclusively refer to major towns and cities, but also any area that was relevant to Lancashire's economic development.

·  Rail would form a part of LTP 4, however it was noted that the county council would not have as much influence over this by comparison with bus service provision.

·  Officers confirmed that as part of the consultation process on LTP 4, both National Highways and the Traffic Commissioners for Great Britain were statutory consultees. The county council worked closely with National Highways.

·  It was highlighted that while East to West connectivity was one of the biggest challenges the county faced regarding transport, any solutions were beyond the reach of the county council alone and would require national interventions. National Highways and Network Rail would have a key role in developing solutions for East-West connectivity (Irish Sea to North Sea). It was explained that the county council alone would not have the funds to solve connectivity problems such as the Colne to Skipton rail link.

·  On environmental challenges the committee was informed that lower transport carbon emissions was a long-term aspiration, though specific solutions such as hydrogen had not yet been considered at this stage.

·  It was confirmed that addressing transport related social exclusion was included in plan's objectives.

·  Members felt that the definition of 'key centres' was ambiguous. It was highlighted that the county council needed to be specific in what it wanted to achieve, and that further thought should be given to the definition of key centres.

·  Concerns were raised on the geographical coverage and wider connectivity with bus and rail. It was felt that the county council should not be confined to progressing connectivity within its own boundary but also beyond the boundaries of Lancashire.

Resolved: That the Cabinet Member for Economic Development and Growth be asked to consider:

(i)  Reviewing and clarifying the definition of key centres.

(ii)  The inclusion of connectivity issues beyond the administrative boundaries of the three upper tier authorities of Lancashire within the Local Transport Plan 4.

The Head of Service Democratic Services, following consultation with County Councillor Paul Rigby, Champion for Parishes, approved a Champions Grant application for the reduced amount of £1000 to Broughton Parish Council towards the cost of a defibrillator.

The Head of Service Democratic Services, following consultation with County Councillor Peter Britcliffe, Champion for Disabled People, approved a Champions Grant application of £1295.93 to Pendle Group Riding for the Disabled Association towards the cost of new rails and posts for their outdoor horse riding arena.

The Head Of Service Democratic Services, following consultation with County Councillor Stuart C Morris, Champion for Mental Health, approved a Champions Grant application for the reduced amount of £1000 to Making Space towards the cost of transport and refreshments on their days out.

The Head of Service Democratic Services Manager, following consultation with County Councillor Joan Burrows, Champion for Older People, approved a Champions Grant application for the reduced amount of £100 to Friends of Longridge Civic Hall towards the cost of their monthly seated exercise classes.

The Head of Service Democratic Services, following consultation with County Councillor Joan Burrows, Champion for Older People, approved a Champions Grant application for the reduced amount of £194.06 to Hesketh Bank/Tarleton Community Helpers towards the cost of their Christmas lunch.

County Councillor Paul Rigby considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £600 to Freckleton Music Festival towards the cost of transport for choir members.

Award of reinforcement order to EDV Ltd following mini competition exercise.

1 Supplier declined, 2 did not respond, 1 supplier returned.

Order to be awarded as delivery dates fit within the schemes critical path, thus no delays to project are encountered.

Ridwan Musa, Head of Highway Operations and Design, on behalf of Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport took a decision to award order of reinforcement order to EDV Ltd.

County Councillor Paul Rigby considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £250 to Amber Bee CIC towards the cost of 2 projects for children and a drama production.

County Councillor Nikki Hennessy considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £250 to Amber Bee CIC towards the cost of 2 projects for children and a drama production.

County Councillor John Fillis considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £500 to First Upholland Scout Group towards the cost of pool hire.

County Councillor Alan Whittaker considered and rejected a Local Member Grant to St Micheal and All Angels Church towards the cost of church repairs.

The reason for rejection is County Councillor Alan Whittaker is reserving funding for other organisations.

County Councillor Alan Whittaker considered and rejected a Local Member Grant to Sea Cadets Chorley towards the cost of electrical repairs.

The reason for rejection is County Councillor Alan Whittaker is reserving funding for other organisations.

Resolved: That the press and members of the public be excluded from the meeting during consideration of the following items of business on the grounds that there would be a likely disclosure of exempt information, as defined in the appropriate paragraph of Part I of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972.

It was considered that in all the circumstances, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information.

Resolved: That the minutes of the meeting held on 1 August 2024 be confirmed as an accurate record.

This report presents an application from a local organisation requesting £800 towards a day trip for 35 people from Burnley to Saltaire from the Local Member Grants Scheme.

County Councillor Joan Burrows considered and rejected a Local Member Grant to St Stephen's Church - Friend, Food and Fun Group towards the cost of a day trip for 35 people from Burnley to Saltaire.

The reason for rejection is the project date passed before we received a decision from County Councillor Burrows and we are unable to award a grant retrospectively.

County Councillor John R Singleton JP considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £300 to Singleton Village Gala towards the cost of the Singleton Village Gala Weekend 2025.

This decision relates to the approval to conduct a direct award, via the NHS - National Framework for the Provision of Clinical and Healthcare Staffing, to facilitate the management of a current backlog of DoLS assessments.

Elaina Quesada, Deputy Executive Director of Adult Services took a decision to approve the direct award.

County Councillor Lizzi Collinge considered and rejected a Local Member Grant to Community Mind Connect C.I.C towards the cost of running a film screening and art exhibition event.

The reason for rejection is the project date passed before we received a decision from County Councillor Collinge.

As part of the normal process of service delivery, the approved highways capital programme now requires amendments to the street lighting programme to meet emerging priorities.

It is proposed to reallocate funds within the programme to allow completed projects to be closed out.

Ridwan Musa, Head of Service, Highways Operations and Design, Highways and Transport, on behalf of Matt Townsend Director, Highways and Transport took a decision to approve the reallocation of funds.

County Councillor Jackie Oakes considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £200 to More in the Room CIC towards the cost of a community safety scheme.

County Councillor Samara Barnes considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £200 to More in the Room CIC towards the cost of a community safety scheme.

County Councillor Sean Serridge considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £200 to More in the Room CIC towards the cost of a community safety scheme.

The purpose of the one way order is to formalise the One-Way restrictions that are currently on site on Moor Lane, Castle Gate, Castle Street, Market Place and York Street to allow for effective enforcement.? There will be no changes to the restriction or its extent on site, therefore drivers will not be subject to any changes as a result of this proposal.

Peter Bell, Regulation and Enforcement Manager, on behalf of the Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport took a decision to approve this order.

It is proposed to introduce a restricted parking zone area on Castle Street Clitheroe for its entire length.

The purpose of the restricted parking zone is to eliminate illegal parking, improve traffic flow and improve pedestrian visibility and safety.

Peter Bell, Regulation and Enforcement Manager, on behalf of the Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport took a decision to approve this order.

This decision is to replace CC Ash Sutcliffe with CC Alan Cullens on the Friend of Lancashire Archives Outside Body.

Heloise MacAndrew, Director of Law and Governance took a decision to replace CC Ash Sutcliffe with CC Alan Cullens on the Friends of Lancashire Archives Outside Body.

Peter Bell, Regulation and Enforcement Manager, on behalf of the Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport took a decision to approve this order.

County Councillor Steven Holgate considered and rejected a Local Member Grant to TAAG Youth Committee towards the cost of quarterly events. 

The reason for the rejection is County Councillor Steven Holgate is reserving funding to support other organisations.

County Councillor Barrie Yates considered and rejected a Local Member Grant to TAAG Youth Committee towards the cost of the creation of TAAG's first junior committee.

The reason for rejection is County Councillor Yates is reserving funding to support organisations that he believes will support his division more directly.

The purpose of this proposal is to introduce double yellow lines to prevent obstructive parking behaviour, allowing for the safe use of the mini-roundabout and access of the premises along Rhyddings Street and to maintain visibility along this road.

The limited waiting bay will be shortened slightly on Union Road and replaced with double yellow lines to allow vehicles to safely manoeuvre on egress of the roundabout.

Peter Bell, Regulation and Enforcement Manager, on behalf of the Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport took a decision to approve this order.

The purpose of the proposed Zebra crossing is to provide a safe crossing point for pedestrians in order to promote sustainable travel and promote social inclusion.

Peter Bell, Regulation and Enforcement Manager, on behalf of the Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport took a decision to approve this order.

The purpose of the proposed 20mph speed limit is to improve the safety for all highway users especially pedestrians and to increase the sustainability for the development.

Peter Bell, Regulation and Enforcement Manager, on behalf of the Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport took a decision to approve this order.

Lancashire County Council have an ongoing regulatory requirement to ensure portable electrical appliances are safe to use, fit for purpose and conform to the Health and Safety at Work Act of 1974, Electricity at Work Regulations of 1989, Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations of 1998 and the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations of 1999. The most effective way to ensure that these regulations are met is through the provision of an annual PAT test.

Noel O'Neill, Director of Finance and Commerce took a decision to approve commencement of the open tender procedure.

Peter Bell, Regulation and Enforcement Manager, on behalf of the Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport took a decision to approve this order.

This report sets out a recommendation, following completion of a tender exercise, conducted in accordance with the County Council's standing orders, to approve the award of a single supplier contract for the provision of pinch point analysis tool to support bus improvement activities.

Marcus Hudson, Head of Service Planning and Transport on behalf of the Andrew Mullaney, Director of Environment and Planning took a decision to award the contract as set out in the report.

As part of the normal process of service delivery, the approved highways capital programme now requires amendments to the street lighting programme to meet emerging priorities.

It is proposed to reallocate funds within the programme to allow completed projects to be closed out.

Ridwan Musa, Head of Service for Highway Operations and Design, on behalf of Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport took a decision to approve the reallocation of funds within the Street Lighting Defects Programme. Details of the proposed reallocation is shown in appendix A. There is no change to the total budget.

Transfer of a small area of public amenity land.

Gary Jones, Estates Manager on behalf of the Simon Lawrence Lawrence, Director of Growth and Regeneration took a decision to approve the transfer of the land.

County Councillor Jenny Purcell considered and approved a Local Member Grant for the reduced amount of £300 to Pendle Riding for the Disabled Association Incorporating Carriage Driving towards the cost of 8 new adjustable regularity riding hats and a defibrillator.

The reason for the reduction is County Councillor Purcell is reserving funding to support as many organisations in her division as possible.

County Councillor Mike Goulthorp considered and rejected a Local Member Grant to Pendle Riding for the Disabled Association Incorporating Carriage Driving towards the cost of 8 new adjustable regularity riding hats and a defibrillator.

The reason for rejection is County Councillor Goulthorp is reserving funding to support another organisation in his division.

County Councillor Alf Clempson considered and approved a Local Member Grant for the reduced amount of £259.40 to MHA Communities Blackpool, Wyre and Fylde towards the cost of supporting two groups of older people who are socially isolated and lonely.

The reason for the reduction is County Councillor Clempson has allocated his remaining budget to this organisation.

County Councillor Alan Vincent considered and approved a Local Member Grant for the reduced amount of £361.62 to MHA Communities Blackpool, Wyre and Fylde towards the cost of supporting two groups of older people who are socially isolated and lonely.

The reason for the reduction is County Councillor Vincent has allocated his remaining budget between this organisation and another applicant.

County Councillor Mike Goulthorp considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £1,000 to Earby Memorial Bowling Club towards the cost of an electric bowling green mower.

County Councillor Alan Vincent considered and approved a Local Member Grant for the reduced amount of £361.62 to LPM Dance towards the cost of specialist dance/movement classes for people with disabilities and a Christmas sharing event.

The reason for the reduction is County Councillor Vincent has allocated his remaining budget between this organisation and another applicant.

County Councillor Stewart Jones considered and rejected a Local Member Grant to Kirkham & Rural Fylde 41 Club towards the cost of operating Santa's Sleigh charity collections around the Fylde.

The reason for rejection is because County Councillor Jones has no funds remaining in his Local Member Grants budget.

The Head of Service Democratic and Member Services, following consultation with County Councillor Loraine Cox, Champion for Young People, approved a Champions Grant application for the reduced amount of £200 to WAVE Adventure towards the cost of the accreditation fees.

The Head of Service Democratic and Member Services, following consultation with County Councillor Loraine Cox, Champion for Young People, approved a Champions Grant application of £206.91 to Oswaldtwisle St Mary's Football Club towards the cost of football cones.

The Head of Servicde  Democratic Servicesr, following consultation with County Councillor Loraine Cox, Champion for Young People, approved a Champions Grant application of £500 to Amazing Accrington towards the cost of transport to the Accrington Stanley's Big Shirt Giveaway.

The Head of Service Democratic Servicesr, following consultation with County Councillor Peter Britcliffe, Champion for Disabled People, approved a Champions Grant application for the reduced amount of £250 to Amazing Accrington towards the cost of your transport costs to the Accrington Stanley's Big Shirt Giveaway.

County Councillor Stewart Jones considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £200 to Kirkham Pride towards the cost of lighting, sound and audio equipment for the stage.

County Councillor Stewart Jones considered and approved a Local Member Grant for the reduced amount of £300 to Kirkham Christmas Lights towards the cost of the community event.

The reason for the reduction is County Councillor Jones has allocated his remaining funding to this organisation.

The Head of Service Democratic Services, following consultation with County Councillor Loraine Cox, Champion for Young People, approved a Champions Grant application for the reduced amount of £200 to Visually Impaired Childrens' Support towards the cost of the buffet at their Christmas Party.

A decision on feasibility funds for PPMS ID 15464.

David Cahill, Capital Programme Officer, on behalf of the Noel O'Neill, Director of Finance and Commerce, took the decision as set out in the report.

The Head of Service Democratic Services, following consultation with County Councillor Peter Britcliffe, Champion for Disabled People, approved a Champions Grant application for the reduced amount of £2000 to T.E.A.M.R.I.S.E towards the cost of props and costumes for their annual pantomine.

The Head of Service Democratic Services, following consultation with County Councillor Joan Burrows, Champion for Older People, approved a Champions Grant application for the reduced amount of £100 to Newburgh Parish Council towards the cost of their coffee mornings.

There were no apologies received.

Resolved: That the press and members of the public be excluded from the meeting during consideration of the following items of business on the grounds that there would be a likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in the appropriate paragraph of Part I of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972.

It was considered that in all the circumstances, the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information.

County Councillor Joan Burrows considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £900 to Kingsfold Junior Football Club towards the cost of football coaching.

Mike Neville, Senior Democratic Services Officer, authorised County Councillor E Pope (Chair of the Pension Fund Committee) and Mr K Ellard, scheme member representative on the Lancashire Local Pension Board, to attend/participate in the PLSA Conference on 15^th – 17^th October 2024 in Liverpool and for the payment of any associated delegate fees, travel, or accommodation costs as appropriate by the Lancashire County Pension Fund.

A decision on the direct award of Digital Marketer Level 6 Apprenticeship to the University of Central Lancashire.

Rachel Rump, Head of Talent & Performance, on behalf of the Lucy Thompson, Director of People, took the decision as set out in the report.

A decision on the direct award of Finance Assistant Level 2 Apprenticeship to Runshaw College.

Rachel Rump, Head of Talent & Performance, on behalf of the Lucy Thompson, Director of People took the decision as set out in the report.

It is proposed to make amendments to 21/22, 22/23, 23/24 LDF Programmes as set out in Appendix A.

Ridwan Musa, HOS Highways and Transport Operations, on behalf of the Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport took a decision to approve adjustment of budgets.

County Councillor David O'Toole considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £400 to Shirley Hill Community Association towards the cost of a new village marquee.

County Councillor Matthew Tomlinson considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £250 to Chorley Women's Centre towards the cost of running community workshops.

County Councillor Jeff Couperthwaite considered and rejected a Local Member Grant to Chorley Women's Centre towards the cost of running community workshops.

The reason for rejection is County Councillor Couperthwaite is reserving funding for groups within his division.

County Councillor David O'Toole considered and rejected a Local Member Grant to Ormskirk Street Pastors towards the cost of training Street Pastors.

The reason for the rejection is County Councillor O'Toole is reserving funding for groups within his own division.

County Councillor Mohammed Iqbal MBE rejected a Local Member Grant to Church on the Street Ministries towards the cost of supporting students on their Exodus Recovery Project.

The reason for rejection is a decision was not received from County Councillor Iqbal before the organisations project date passed.

County Councillor Usman Arif rejected a Local Member Grant to Church on the Street Ministries towards the cost of supporting students on their Exodus Recovery Project.

The reason for rejection is a decision was not received from County Councillor Arif before the organisations project date passed.

County Councillor Lian Pate rejected a Local Member Grant to Church on the Street Ministries towards the cost of supporting students on their Exodus Recovery Project.

The reason for rejection is a decision was not received from County Councillor Pate before the organisations project date passed.

County Councillor Alan Hosker rejected a Local Member Grant to Church on the Street Ministries towards the cost of supporting students on their Exodus Recovery Project.

The reason for rejection is a decision was not received from County Councillor Hosker before the organisations project date passed.

County Councillor Azhar Ali OBE rejected a Local Member Grant to Church on the Street Ministries towards the cost of supporting students on their Exodus Recovery Project.

The reason for rejection is a decision was not received from County Councillor Ali before the organisations project date passed.

A decision on the direct award of Taxation Technician Level 4 Apprenticeship to Runshaw College.

Rachel Rump, Head of Talent & Performance, on behalf of the Lucy Thompson, Director of People took the decision as set out in the report.

County Councillor Jenny Purcell considered and approved a Local Member Grant for the reduced amount of £100 to Rolls Football Club towards the cost of the Summer Treatment Programme.

The reason for the reduction is County Councillor Purcell is reserving funding to support other projects in her division.

County Councillor Mike Goulthorp considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £500 to Rolls Football Club towards the cost of the Summer Treatment Programme.

County Councillor John R Singleton JP considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £345 to Staining In Bloom towards the cost of 10 Floribunda Roses, 2 tonnes of compost and assorted bulbs.

County Councillor Sue Hind considered and approved a Local Member Grant for the increased amount of £645 to Clitheroe Bowling Club towards the cost of a bowling green mower.

It was noted that the Part II item listed on the agenda related to an appendix for a report already discussed in Part I on the agenda. There being no questions to be raised on the appendix, it was agreed that the meeting remain in Part I.

Resolved: That the meeting remain in Part I, open to press and public.

Resolved: That the minutes of the meeting held on 11 July 2024 be confirmed as a correct record and signed by the Chair.

Resolved: That the three urgent decisions taken by the Leader of the County Council, and the relevant Cabinet Members, since the last meeting of Cabinet, be noted.

County Councillor Terry Hurn considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £500 to Growing Wild towards the cost of community allotment sessions.

A decision on the approval of a change control – Impower.

Laurence Ainsworth, Director of Strategy and Performance took a decision as set out in the report.

This report provides an update to Cabinet on the county council's 2024/25 revenue and capital financial position, as at the end of June 2024. The Quarter 1 monitoring position contains assumptions relating to demand levels and savings delivery across a number of services, most particularly social care, which at this stage in the financial year are based on a number of assumptions based on costs and income to date and service knowledge.

There are spending challenges across all of council services as is common with most councils across the country. Whilst Lancashire remains in a relatively strong financial position, this is within a sector with declining financial sustainability that needs addressing at a national level. This report sets out some of the financial challenges the council currently faces. It also sets out some of the achievements and progress that has been made this year to date.

The forecast outturn position is £7.590m after implementing £20.76m of remedial actions and use of one-off funding. Directorates have been asked to complete further remedial action plans to look to produce a balanced budget by the end of the financial year.

The capital delivery programme for 2024/25 is £187.095m following confirmation of slippage from 2023/24 in the outturn report to Cabinet in July. The forecast expenditure is £186.322m giving an underspend of £0.773m (0.41%).

The Cabinet approved the recommendation(s) as set out in the report.

The Lancashire Children and Young People's Plan 2024-2028 sets out the county council's vision and priorities to ensure that children and young people are safe, healthy, happy, develop skills for life and are active citizens who feel they have a voice and influence.

Subject to agreement by Cabinet, and the production of a version for publication, the final draft of the Lancashire Children and Young People's Plan 2024-2028 will be presented to Full Council for approval in October 2024.

The Cabinet approved the recommendation(s) as set out in the report.

This report presents the Lancashire Child and Youth Justice Plan for 2024/25.

The Cabinet approved the recommendation(s) as set out in the report.

In line with the county council's procurement rules, this report sets out a recommendation to approve the commencement of the following procurement exercises:

(i) Renewal of ServiceNow Licenses

(ii) Acceptance and Disposal of Waste Upholstered Domestic Seating containing Persistent Organic Pollutants services

(iii) Agency Staff Neutral Vendor Managed Service and Workforce Solutions

(iv) Responsive Minor Adaptations

(v) Traditional Road Surfacing and Associated Services

This is deemed to be a Key Decision and the requirements of the council's Cabinet procedure rules (Standing Order C18, Consideration of Key Decisions) have been complied with.

The Cabinet approved the recommendation(s) as set out in the report.

This report provides the first overview of performance for 2024/25. There are 42 key performance indicators established which will be monitored over the course of the year, with an additional key performance indicator on the proportion of key performance indicators on track to be delivered. In 2023 there was a comprehensive review of the key performance indicators, and a lighter review has taken place for this year, with some realignment of metrics to ensure that the council's priority areas are fully reflected.

This report is set out to provide an overview of performance to monitor the delivery of the four priorities of the corporate strategy:

• Delivering better services
• Protecting our environment
• Supporting economic growth
• Caring for the vulnerable

With an additional section on corporate health.

The Cabinet approved the recommendation(s) as set out in the report.

This report sets out a recommendation, following completion of a competitive tendering exercise, conducted in accordance with the County Council's standing orders, to approve the award of a single supplier contract for the provision of Adobe Sign software.

Carol Groom, Head of ICT Strategy & Assurance, on behalf of the Peter Lloyd, Director of Digital, took a decision as set out in the report.

John Davies, Head of Highways Network Management, on behalf of Matt Townsend, Director of Highways and Transport, took a decision to approve the transfer of the grant funding of £710,690.50 back to the Transport Programme.

This report includes the results of the formal consultations to create Special Educational Needs Units at Carnforth Community Primary School, North Road, Carnforth; Clayton Brook Primary School, Great Greens Lane, Clayton Brook, Bamber Bridge, Preston; and St Joseph's Roman Catholic Primary School, Cedar Road, Chorley.

This is deemed to be a Key Decision and the requirements of the council's Cabinet procedure rules (Standing Order C18, Consideration of Key Decisions) have been complied with.

The Cabinet approved the recommendation(s) as set out in the report.

Pupil projections indicate there will be a shortfall of primary school places in the Goosnargh and Grimsargh planning area in Preston, and the adjoining planning area of Longridge in Ribble Valley from 2025/26.

To address the increased demand in these two areas, approval is being sought to commence a public consultation in relation to a proposal to expand Goosnargh Oliverson's Church of England Primary School, increasing the school's published admission number from 30 to 60. This would gradually increase the capacity of the school from 210 to 420 places.

It is intended to provide the expansion initially through a one-year temporary increase to the published admission number from 30 to 60 from September 2025 facilitated by the provision of temporary accommodation. The expansion would then become permanent from September 2026, following the completion of the capital build project.

The Cabinet approved the recommendation(s) as set out in the report.

This report sets out a recommendation, following completion of a competitive tendering exercise, conducted in accordance with the County Council's standing orders, to approve the award of a single supplier contract for the provision of a High Volume Production Scanner including service & maintenance.

This is deemed to be a non-key decision with spend under £2 million.

Authority to take this decision has been delegated to The Head of Service – Carol

Carol Groom, Head of ICT Strategy & Assurance, on behalf of Peter Lloyd, Director of Digital, took a decision to approve the award of a single supplier contract for the provision of a High Volume Production Scanner including service & maintenance.

A new Lancashire and South Cumbria Integrated Care System Dementia Strategy 2024-29 is presented to Cabinet, following extensive engagement with partners in health and social care, hospices, the voluntary sector, and with those with lived experience and their carers in Lancashire and South Cumbria. The Dementia Strategy identifies five key priorities for the Integrated Care System to focus on over the next five years, to be delivered through five sub-groups which ensure broad and inclusive representation.

This is deemed to be a Key Decision and the requirements of the council's Cabinet procedure rules (Standing Order C18, Consideration of Key Decisions) have been complied with.

The Cabinet approved the recommendation(s) as set out in the report.

A decision on the procurement of frozen halal poultry.

Clare Joynson, Head of Facilities Management, on behalf of the Noel O'Neill, Director of Finance and Commerce, took a decision as set out in the report.

A repoprt on a contract modification for the provision of a Digital Platform (Low Code) provided by Netcall via Softcat Plc.

Carol Groom, Head of ICT Strategy & Assurance, on behalf of Peter Lloyd, Director of Digital took a decision as set out in the report.

County Councillor Sobia Malik considered and approved a Local Member Grant of £340 to Fun4Stroke towards the cost of a members trip to Barton Grange.