Agenda item

Progress on the Three Interventions

Presentations

Minutes:

Alcohol Liaison Intervention (Board Members County Councillor Mike Calvert and Dr David Wrigley)

 

Steve Owen, Lead Officer for the Alcohol Liaison Intervention gave a presentation on progress to date on this particular Intervention and what is working well / not well.

 

The current situation in Lancashire is that there are three distinct projects which follow a best fit model as resources allow.  Models are based on local priorities – i.e. reducing alcohol related admission rates and unscheduled care.  There is a good evidence base for interventions and some evidence of emerging partnerships between hospital and community services.

 

Steve explained that the outcomes for Alcohol Liaison had been split into short, medium and long term goals as follows:

 

Short

1year

·  Contracts agreed with providers based on the identified target groups for local projects.

·  Equitable access to liaison services.

·  Robust data collection and monitoring systems for evaluation.

·  Clinical pathways agreed between hospital, GP and community.

·  Increased clinician awareness of alcohol impacts and skills in Identification and Brief Advice.

 

Medium

3-5years

·  Reduce alcohol specific re-admissions and A&E representations within 30 days.

·  Reduce bed usage associated with acute alcohol withdrawal.

·  Improve quality of care for people admitted to hospital for alcohol specific and alcohol related conditions.

·  Reduce alcohol associated demand and cost burden to NHS and partners.

 

Long

2020

·  Reduction in the rate of increase of alcohol related hospital admissions.

·  Improvement in Lancashire Alcohol Profiles for England (LAPE) across Lancashire 12 districts.

·  Positive outcomes over the longer term on other conditions associated with alcohol including mental health, cancer and CVD.

 

 

Steve also highlighted some of the shifts or changes required to ensure the Intervention is effectively implemented as follows:

 

How must partners work to ensure that the ‘priority shifts’ are applied and the intervention is effectively implemented?

·  Partners need to commit to engagement and contribute to implementing alcohol liaison as a priority objective.

·  Partners need to commit resources

·  Partners need to ‘buy in’ to evidence of the benefits of alcohol liaison as an intervention to improve health and reduce demand for services.

·  Partners need to communicate openly regarding barriers to achieving objectives.

·  Partners need to commit to integrated pathways between hospital, community and primary care.

·  Partners need to commit to workforce training and adopting screening for alcohol related issues.

·  Influence of HWB/CCG’s to promote planning priorities.

Who needs to be involved to develop, commission and deliver the intervention?

·  Public Health Lancashire

·  CCG's

·  Acute Trust

·  Primary care services

 

·  Community treatment services

·  Service users

·  Leverage from HWB

What are the ‘milestones’ for the Task Group in the year ahead?

·  Resubmit alcohol liaison business case to funding groups and explore potential for ‘invest to save’ resource shift with providers.

·  Engage all key stakeholders in planning alcohol liaison services.

·  Develop locality implementation plans.

 

 

Board members welcomed the presentation and commented that early intervention to educate people on a healthy lifestyle was important to intervention success, and also commented on some of the wider interventions related to alcohol such as enforcement of alcohol licensing.

 

Loneliness in Older People Intervention (Board Members Michael Wedgeworth and Dr Peter Williams)

 

Habib Patel began the presentation by highlighting the current situation in Lancashire and the strengths and weaknesses as follows:

 

Strengths

 

  Third Sector working with older people in communities.

  Different befriending models.

  Local community groups supporting older people.

  Help Direct – statutory organisations funding older people services.

  Varied choice and provision.

  Lots of good practice and innovation across the county

 

Weaknesses

 

  Sharing information between  agencies  - referral

  Sharing information between intervention service providers

  Duplication and gaps of services

  Not enough good practice sharing across the county

  Not being able to find small amount of resources to get on with projects (sustainability)

  Being clear about what is happening in local areas for lonely older people - for frontline staff to refer

  Lack of holistic approach to health & wellbeing  (including loneliness)

  Inconsistent approach to integrating interventions to address loneliness into care pathways


Habib report the desired outcomes for this Intervention as follows:

 

  Identifying lonely older people by raising awareness amongst all agencies who are involved with older people, identify those who may be vulnerable to loneliness. 

  A simple but effective referral process that has capacity and can be monitored and measured for success.

  Local services which meet the need of older people, without them needing to travel far and therefore accessible on the door step or in the home.

 

Finally, Habib reported to the Board the suggested workstreams for this Intervention and suggestions for how to take this Intervention forward as follows:

 

  Awareness plan for those at risk and for those who know others are at risk.

  Consider Help Direct as first point of call, identify the grit in referral process.

  Bring together a range of evidence (JSNA) to support us in identifying who/where.

  Effective local directory.

  Need to link referral with outcome.


Board members welcomed the presentation and provided feedback, it was suggested that one possible workstream would be to support to use of Help Direct advisors in GP surgeries.

 

Joined up Support for Vulnerable Families (First Pregnancy)

 

Gail Porter, Project Director (Total Family), Lancashire County Council gave a presentation on the work of done on the Support for Vulnerable Families Intervention.  Gail explained that there are a wide range of existing strategic commitments with specific action plans in place but highlighted a number of areas that the Intervention could seek to strengthen:

 

·  Consistency of provision and supply of data across geographies varies.

·  Awareness and use of established guidance.

·  No shared definition of ‘vulnerable family’.

·  Individuals who do not access any midwifery or antenatal services.

  • Progress with Health Visitor Implementation plan.
  • Workforce development and engagement of Higher Education providers (HEIs).
  • Intensive workstream to support developments in UH Morecambe Bay.

 

Gail also highlighted a number of "priority shifts" which could build and utilise the assets, skills and resources of our citizens and communities:

·  reduce reliance on services;

·   increase resilience of families;

·  develop community capacity to support families.

 

Gail explained that another "priority shift" is to shift resources towards prevention and reduce demand on acute services:

·  knowledge – who, where, how;

·   Understanding – why;

·  Delivery – targeted and coordinated;

·  Sustainability - what works.

 

Gail also summarised the programme of work as follows:

 

Knowing

Understanding

Delivering

Sustaining

Improve the flow of data regarding early notification and live births

Health and social needs - strengthen the pathways for both.

Patient walkthrough using Working Together Family cohort

Role of specialist midwives versus mainstream role

Women who do not access midwifery services by 12 weeks – how many, where and why?

Coordination across (the many) existing programmes of work

Academic involvement to  examine lead professional role

Community capacity building i.e. parenting champions

Opportunities presented by the Health Visitor expansion programme

Academic institutions regarding future workforce planning requirements.

 

The Board welcomed the presentation and provided feedback.

 

Resolved: The Shadow Health and Wellbeing Board noted the presentations and it was agreed that further presentations of the remaining seven Interventions would be arranged as soon as possible.